PDittie
PDittie's JournalDamned liberal media
I guess.
https://www.vox.com/2017/11/30/16720730/joe-barton-retire-2018-congress-nude-photo-scandal
It's consumed Texas media for a week
Some thought he might skate past it since it first broke right before Thanksgiving.
https://www.texasmonthly.com/burka-blog/joe-barton-avoided-becoming-texas-turkey/
Exactly.
He's apologized for several of these incidents, yet some would rather believe they just didn't happen.
(BTW, I don't think Franken should resign. But if he should, he had better be holding the door for Trump and Moore to walk out ahead of him.)
To pbmus' point
Could Democrats be in danger of having too much of a good thing?
This, at least, is the line that Republicans in the traditional conservative stronghold of Orange County are peddling.
All the Republicans are unified behind one candidate in each of these races and the Democrats have divided loyalties to candidates who have no name ID, county GOP Chairman Fred Whitaker has said, according to the Orange County Register. Im pretty happy with it.
And so, more than anywhere else, the O.C. will be the place to watch to find whos right.
In November 2015, with roughly a year to go until Election Day 2016, only one Democrat had launched his candidacy across all of Orange County.
Now there are seven Democratic candidates running in Rohrabachers district alone and 23 in the O.C. as a whole, where diversifying demographics, a dwindling Republican registration advantage and Hillary Clintons groundbreaking countywide victory in 2016 have Democrats eyeing four GOP incumbents previously considered safe: Reps. Rohrabacher; Ed Royce, CA-39; Mimi Walters, CA-45; and Darrell Issa, CA-49.
https://sg.news.yahoo.com/democrats-2018-many-candidates-many-candidates-162905320.html
Rohrabacher has one Republican challenger. The danger exists that the seven Dems will dilute the vote, leaving the two Rs to advance to a runoff and defeating the entire purpose of all of this enthusiasm.
Lots more good reading at the link.
Our attitudes as a nation have
changed a lot in just the past few months regarding the topic of male sexual harassment. Just a year ago, trump got elected despite the dozen or more women who have outed him for worse.
Bill Cosby didn't get a pass. O'Reilly didn't, either. GHWB is, though.
And Bill Clinton is getting a rehash here, so there's that.
Nobody seems down to litigate JFK (which I count as a good thing).
Times change. Sometimes faster than at other times.
On topic
It processed through the news cycle more rapidly even than is typical, due IMO to his appropriate handling of it.
No excuse for inaction.
But the Russians did not steal the election.
Last year, Homeland Security disclosed that 21 states' election systems had been targeted by Russian hackers. There was no evidence they actually penetrated the systems. Experts likened the activity to a burglar jiggling a doorknob to see if it is locked.
http://www.chron.com/news/us/article/Local-voting-districts-seen-as-crucial-to-12331682.php
The primary and most serious Russian problem is one of collusion. It's a felony under the Logan Act, but it's up to Congress to prosecute the crime. And that appears unlikely.
Profile Information
Gender: Do not displayHometown: Texas
Member since: 2002
Number of posts: 8,322