In the Real World of Work and Wages, Trickle-Down Theories Don’t Hold Up

If economic theory is unkind to trickle-down proponents, the lessons of experience are downright brutal. If lower real wages induce people to work shorter hours, then the opposite should be true when real wages increase. According to trickle-down theory, then, the cumulative effect of the last century’s sharp rise in real wages should have been a significant increase in hours worked. In fact, however, the workweek is much shorter now than in 1900.

Trickle-down theory also predicts shorter workweeks in countries with lower real after-tax pay rates. Yet here, too, the numbers tell a different story. For example, even though chief executives in Japan earn less than one-fifth what their American counterparts do and face substantially higher marginal tax rates, Japanese executives do not log shorter hours.

Trickle-down theory also predicts a positive correlation between inequality and economic growth, the idea being that income disparities strengthen motivation to get ahead. Yet when researchers track the data within individual countries over time, they find a negative correlation. In the decades immediately after World War II, for example, income inequality was low by historical standards, yet growth rates in most industrial countries were extremely high. In contrast, growth rates have been only about half as large in the years since 1973, a period in which inequality has been steadily rising.

The same pattern has been observed in cross-national data. For example, using data from the World Bank and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development for a sample of 65 industrial nations, the economists Alberto Alesina and Dani Rodrick found lower growth rates in countries where higher shares of national income went to the top 5 percent and the top 20 percent of earners. In contrast, larger shares for poor and middle-income groups were associated with higher growth rates. Again and again, the observed pattern is the opposite of the one predicted by trickle-down theory.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/business/12scene.html?_r=0

Trickle-down economics has failed to create jobs



The Forum piece "Column: U.S. political system needs a reset" infuriated me. The debates about the debt ceiling, the causes and solutions for the current U.S. debt debacle all dance around the real causes and solutions: tax breaks and lack of U.S. manufacturing.

Currently, the wealthiest members pay a smaller percentage in income tax than before. The tax breaks were sold to the public as a means to create jobs through trickle-down economics, which obviously failed. Even with these astronomical tax breaks, corporations have been outsourcing our manufacturing industry at an alarming rate.

While the middle class creeps lower into an economic tar pit, the wealthiest members of our country are accumulating more wealth.

Spending is, of course, an issue, but the real problems with spending come in the form of the enormous military the U.S. maintains.

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/opinion/letters/2011-08-15-taxes-for-wealthy-Tea-Party_n.htm