Buzz Clik
Buzz Clik's JournalThe Sanders crowd is highly emotionally invested in this Vatican story.
Sanders's lie is the second of two huge fibs in less than a week.
That's gotta sting.
About these polls: I think CBS/YouGov has it figured out.
Not everyone likes polls, but a well designed poll can be highly informative. Michigan last week on the Dem side did not have good polling numbers, for a bunch of reasons. After standing back, digging in, and discussing this, it was clear that Michigan was NOT an anomaly but a warning about poorly constructed polls.
With about 1/3 of the states' primaries in our rear view mirror and lots of polling data, the pollsters are starting to figure it out. Specifically, CBS/YouGov seems to be nailing it: they have Sanders leading Clinton by 2% in Illinois, a state that fits the Michigan model: an open primary with similar demographics.
I'm going by the assumption that CBS/YouGov has good numbers. So, let's take a look at their poll numbers:
(I cannot find any other YouGov polls for this Tuesday)
Resulting delegate split: Clinton 279, Sanders 234
(I'm giving Sanders ALL the undecideds, so this is best case scenario for Sanders with these poll numbers)
===========
Giving Missouri to Sanders by 10% and NC to Clinton by 10%, those delegates get split Clinton 91, Sanders 88
My projected total for Tuesday only: Clinton 370; Sanders 321
Running total (pledged only): Clinton 1,145; Sanders 871
SNL Opening: Hillary gets burned, Trump revealed, Cruz ridiculed, and Sanders ignored.
The anatomy of voting, and voting with one's anatomy.
I saw a thread in which Susan Sarandon is quoted as saying she doesn't "vote with my vagina." Is that even possible? I was trying to imagine such a thing, and drew a blank -- punch cards, butterfly ballot, voting machine, electronic voting. Nothing.
You don't have to explain how, but is it possible to vote with one's vagina?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/128094059
Profile Information
Member since: Mon Dec 22, 2003, 11:13 AMNumber of posts: 38,437
