Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
unhappycamper
unhappycamper's Journal
unhappycamper's Journal
June 24, 2014
Four aircraft carriers (at least $18 billion dollars 'worth'), from back to front, the Abraham Lincoln (72), the Enterprise (65), the George H.W. Bush (77) and the Dwight D. Eisenhower (69), tied up at Norfolk Naval Station on Thursday, February 14, 2013.
Military pay is outpacing civilians'. Is it justified?
By Dianna Cahn
The Virginian-Pilot
© June 22, 2014
NORFOLK
Whether you are military or civilian, enlisted or officer mention military pay in this region and you are likely to hear an earful.
To some, the topic is synonymous with the nations commitment to those who serve and sacrifice on its behalf. Others see military pay and benefits surpassing civilian wages and question whether theyre too generous, especially as Congress grapples with reductions in defense spending. Its an emotional issue, especially in Hampton Roads, where military pay drives the economy.
~snip~
In Hampton Roads, 25 percent of all goods and services are directly tied to defense spending; that figure climbs to 40 percent when defense procurement and contractors are included, Wagner said.
So small changes, for example, can have a pretty strong effect here because of the magnitude of (Department of Defense) presence, Wagner said.
Military pay is outpacing civilians'. Is it justified?
http://hamptonroads.com/2014/06/military-pay-has-been-outpacing-civilians-it-justifiedFour aircraft carriers (at least $18 billion dollars 'worth'), from back to front, the Abraham Lincoln (72), the Enterprise (65), the George H.W. Bush (77) and the Dwight D. Eisenhower (69), tied up at Norfolk Naval Station on Thursday, February 14, 2013.
Military pay is outpacing civilians'. Is it justified?
By Dianna Cahn
The Virginian-Pilot
© June 22, 2014
NORFOLK
Whether you are military or civilian, enlisted or officer mention military pay in this region and you are likely to hear an earful.
To some, the topic is synonymous with the nations commitment to those who serve and sacrifice on its behalf. Others see military pay and benefits surpassing civilian wages and question whether theyre too generous, especially as Congress grapples with reductions in defense spending. Its an emotional issue, especially in Hampton Roads, where military pay drives the economy.
~snip~
In Hampton Roads, 25 percent of all goods and services are directly tied to defense spending; that figure climbs to 40 percent when defense procurement and contractors are included, Wagner said.
So small changes, for example, can have a pretty strong effect here because of the magnitude of (Department of Defense) presence, Wagner said.
June 24, 2014
Pentagon says missile defense system hit target in test
By DAVID LERMAN and TONY CAPACCIO
Bloomberg News
June 23, 2014 Updated 18 hours ago
WASHINGTON -- The Pentagon said its $34 billion ground-based system to defend the continental U.S. successfully intercepted a dummy incoming missile for the first time since 2008.
The test, using a conventional warhead made by Raytheon, took place on Sunday over the Pacific Ocean, the Defense Department said in an emailed statement. The interceptor missile made by Orbital Sciences was fired from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. Boeing manages the ground-based missile defense program.
"This is a very important step in our continuing efforts to improve and increase the reliability of our homeland ballistic missile defense system," Vice Admiral James Syring, director of the Pentagon's Missile Defense Agency, said in the statement.
Two 2010 tests failed, as did one last July that used an older warhead that's on 20 of the 30 interceptors based in silos at Vandenberg and Fort Greely in Alaska.
--
The Missile Defense System was Ronnie Raygun's wet dream.
Pentagon says missile defense system hit target in test
http://www.adn.com/2014/06/23/3529188/pentagon-says-missile-defense.html?sp=/99/188/189/288/Pentagon says missile defense system hit target in test
By DAVID LERMAN and TONY CAPACCIO
Bloomberg News
June 23, 2014 Updated 18 hours ago
WASHINGTON -- The Pentagon said its $34 billion ground-based system to defend the continental U.S. successfully intercepted a dummy incoming missile for the first time since 2008.
The test, using a conventional warhead made by Raytheon, took place on Sunday over the Pacific Ocean, the Defense Department said in an emailed statement. The interceptor missile made by Orbital Sciences was fired from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. Boeing manages the ground-based missile defense program.
"This is a very important step in our continuing efforts to improve and increase the reliability of our homeland ballistic missile defense system," Vice Admiral James Syring, director of the Pentagon's Missile Defense Agency, said in the statement.
Two 2010 tests failed, as did one last July that used an older warhead that's on 20 of the 30 interceptors based in silos at Vandenberg and Fort Greely in Alaska.
--
The Missile Defense System was Ronnie Raygun's wet dream.
June 24, 2014
Iraq and the emerging regional disorder
By Zorawar Daulet Singh
Jun 24, '14
US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel last week expressed a truism when he remarked, "recent crises in Iraq and Ukraine remind us all how quickly things can change in the world, and not for the better."
Since 1980, the Carter Doctrine (America reserves the right to use force to defend its interests in West Asia) has been the dominant image of the regional security system. The US took West Asia into its sphere of influence, and, Washington could be relied upon to ensure a modicum of geopolitical leadership. After all, this was the implicit contract between America and the world. The US would supply public goods via geopolitical stability and receive the consent of regional and global stakeholders to a US-led regional order. Yet the invasion of Iraq in 2003, the impasse with Iran, NATO's strike on Libya, the Syrian civil war, strengthening of radical Islam in Egypt, and Turkey's drift away from its secular moorings collectively suggest that the US can no longer credibly present itself as a regional security provider.
If there is one stark contradiction in US foreign policy it is this: A relative power decline and the weakening of the domestic base for a superpower role suggest that America would seek to craft a new role, one consistent with its means and body politic. A recent Bloomberg poll showed that 58% of the Americans surveyed felt the US was in decline as a world leader. Yet, a parallel self-image of an exceptional America as a "city upon a hill" seems to be the persistent default mantra for any mainstream policymaker. Obama's West Point speech in May exemplified this: "I believe in American exceptionalism with every fiber of my being", even as he wisely argued against the overuse of the American military "hammer". But then also insisting, "America must always lead on the world stage. If we don't, no one else will."
The dichotomy between the declining capacity and strong will to sustain an exceptional role, and, the persistence of a discourse of exceptionalism among US elites suggests a potentially dangerous inflexion point has been reached. This is nothing short of an American identity crisis that is part of the normative and material transition to a multipolar world.
Iraq and the emerging regional disorder
http://atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/MID-02-240614.htmlIraq and the emerging regional disorder
By Zorawar Daulet Singh
Jun 24, '14
US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel last week expressed a truism when he remarked, "recent crises in Iraq and Ukraine remind us all how quickly things can change in the world, and not for the better."
Since 1980, the Carter Doctrine (America reserves the right to use force to defend its interests in West Asia) has been the dominant image of the regional security system. The US took West Asia into its sphere of influence, and, Washington could be relied upon to ensure a modicum of geopolitical leadership. After all, this was the implicit contract between America and the world. The US would supply public goods via geopolitical stability and receive the consent of regional and global stakeholders to a US-led regional order. Yet the invasion of Iraq in 2003, the impasse with Iran, NATO's strike on Libya, the Syrian civil war, strengthening of radical Islam in Egypt, and Turkey's drift away from its secular moorings collectively suggest that the US can no longer credibly present itself as a regional security provider.
If there is one stark contradiction in US foreign policy it is this: A relative power decline and the weakening of the domestic base for a superpower role suggest that America would seek to craft a new role, one consistent with its means and body politic. A recent Bloomberg poll showed that 58% of the Americans surveyed felt the US was in decline as a world leader. Yet, a parallel self-image of an exceptional America as a "city upon a hill" seems to be the persistent default mantra for any mainstream policymaker. Obama's West Point speech in May exemplified this: "I believe in American exceptionalism with every fiber of my being", even as he wisely argued against the overuse of the American military "hammer". But then also insisting, "America must always lead on the world stage. If we don't, no one else will."
The dichotomy between the declining capacity and strong will to sustain an exceptional role, and, the persistence of a discourse of exceptionalism among US elites suggests a potentially dangerous inflexion point has been reached. This is nothing short of an American identity crisis that is part of the normative and material transition to a multipolar world.
June 24, 2014
Obamas Drone Memo Revealed: US Govt can over-rule 4th Amendment
By contributors | Jun. 24, 2014
By Sarah Lazare
The U.S. government on Monday partially released the formerly-classified Department of Justice "drone memo," dated 2010, in which Obama administration lawyers argue they have the right to extra-judicially kill U.S. citizen Anwar al-Aulaqi in Yemen.
Anwar Al Aulaqi, who had been placed on a "kill list," died by U.S. drone strikes in September 2011, along with Samir Khan, as well as three other people. Just weeks later, another U.S. drone attack on a restaurant in Yemen killed Anwar Al-Aulaqi's son Abdulrahman, also a U.S. citizen, and six other civilians.
In the memo, which is addressed to attorney general Eric Holder, David Barronthen head of the Justice Departments Office of Legal Counselargues that the targeted killing is legal where, as here, the target's activities pose a continued and imminent threat of violence or death' to U.S. persons, the highest officers in the Intelligence Community have reviewed the factual basis for the lethal operation, and a capture operation would be infeasible.
~snip~
Barron claims the killing is justified by the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Forcea highly controversial and expansive congressional act that has been expansively interpreted by the Bush and Obama administrations to authorize ongoing war and occupation in Afghanistan, covert drone wars in Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia, military intervention in countries from Ethiopia to Iraq, indefinite detentions at Guantanamo Bay and Bagram prison, and more.
--
AUMF - the gift that keeps on giving.
Obama’s Drone Memo Revealed: US Gov’t can over-rule 4th Amendment
http://www.juancole.com/2014/06/obamas-revealed-amendment.htmlObamas Drone Memo Revealed: US Govt can over-rule 4th Amendment
By contributors | Jun. 24, 2014
By Sarah Lazare
The U.S. government on Monday partially released the formerly-classified Department of Justice "drone memo," dated 2010, in which Obama administration lawyers argue they have the right to extra-judicially kill U.S. citizen Anwar al-Aulaqi in Yemen.
Anwar Al Aulaqi, who had been placed on a "kill list," died by U.S. drone strikes in September 2011, along with Samir Khan, as well as three other people. Just weeks later, another U.S. drone attack on a restaurant in Yemen killed Anwar Al-Aulaqi's son Abdulrahman, also a U.S. citizen, and six other civilians.
In the memo, which is addressed to attorney general Eric Holder, David Barronthen head of the Justice Departments Office of Legal Counselargues that the targeted killing is legal where, as here, the target's activities pose a continued and imminent threat of violence or death' to U.S. persons, the highest officers in the Intelligence Community have reviewed the factual basis for the lethal operation, and a capture operation would be infeasible.
~snip~
Barron claims the killing is justified by the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Forcea highly controversial and expansive congressional act that has been expansively interpreted by the Bush and Obama administrations to authorize ongoing war and occupation in Afghanistan, covert drone wars in Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia, military intervention in countries from Ethiopia to Iraq, indefinite detentions at Guantanamo Bay and Bagram prison, and more.
--
AUMF - the gift that keeps on giving.
June 24, 2014
Another Atrocious Corporate Trade Scheme Planned in Secret Comes to Light
By Dave Johnson
June 20, 2014
Another secret trade deal has leaked to WikiLeaks and it looks as if it is one more effort to lock into law the interests of certain already-huge corporations above the interests of governments, their citizens and potentially competing businesses.
As with leaks from the secret Tran-Pacific Partnership negotiations, this leak shows that the largest corporations are working to bypass recent efforts by governments to rein them in by pushing through trade agreements that override their ability to write their own laws and regulations.
This time the leak is the Financial Services Annex of the Trade in Services Agreement (TISA). It shows that the TISA negotiations are an effort to not only undo the minimal regulation of Wall Street that occurred after the financial crash, but to further deregulate financial markets worldwide. As WikiLeaks words it, Despite the failures in financial regulation evident during the 2007-2008 Global Financial Crisis and calls for improvement of relevant regulatory structures, proponents of TISA aim to further deregulate global financial services markets.
TISA is a huge trade agreement that covers the services sector, which includes audiovisual; finance; insurance; energy services; transportation, logistics, and express delivery services; information technology services; and telecommunications. TISA currently has 50 countries participating in the negotiations: Australia, Canada, Chile, Taiwan, Colombia, Costa Rica, European Union, Hong Kong, Iceland, Israel, Japan, Liechtenstein, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Republic of Korea, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States. (European Union includes: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and United Kingdom.)
Another Atrocious Corporate Trade Scheme Planned in Secret Comes to Light
http://www.alternet.org/corporate-accountability-and-workplace/another-atrocious-corporate-trade-scheme-planned-secret-comesAnother Atrocious Corporate Trade Scheme Planned in Secret Comes to Light
By Dave Johnson
June 20, 2014
Another secret trade deal has leaked to WikiLeaks and it looks as if it is one more effort to lock into law the interests of certain already-huge corporations above the interests of governments, their citizens and potentially competing businesses.
As with leaks from the secret Tran-Pacific Partnership negotiations, this leak shows that the largest corporations are working to bypass recent efforts by governments to rein them in by pushing through trade agreements that override their ability to write their own laws and regulations.
This time the leak is the Financial Services Annex of the Trade in Services Agreement (TISA). It shows that the TISA negotiations are an effort to not only undo the minimal regulation of Wall Street that occurred after the financial crash, but to further deregulate financial markets worldwide. As WikiLeaks words it, Despite the failures in financial regulation evident during the 2007-2008 Global Financial Crisis and calls for improvement of relevant regulatory structures, proponents of TISA aim to further deregulate global financial services markets.
TISA is a huge trade agreement that covers the services sector, which includes audiovisual; finance; insurance; energy services; transportation, logistics, and express delivery services; information technology services; and telecommunications. TISA currently has 50 countries participating in the negotiations: Australia, Canada, Chile, Taiwan, Colombia, Costa Rica, European Union, Hong Kong, Iceland, Israel, Japan, Liechtenstein, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Republic of Korea, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States. (European Union includes: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and United Kingdom.)
June 24, 2014
New Yorkers may disagree but Beantown's environmental protection efforts are its water's secret ingredient.
Why Boston Has the Best Tasting Tap Water in the Nation
By Daniel Moss
June 23, 2014
If you already love Boston for its unmistakable accent and unpredictable baseball team, you might want to consider adding its tap water to your list. Boston came out on top of this years tap water taste test, an annual competition hosted by the American Water Works Associationa network of more than 50,000 water professionals charged with keeping our water supply healthy. The honor was particularly fitting since the associations conference was held in Boston this year.
Forests in the protected area clean the water naturally so that by the time it gets to the city it requires only limited filtering. Theres no need for the cocktail of chemicals most cities water utilities use.Bostons secret ingredient? Watershed protection. Between 1985 and 2012, the Massachusetts Water Resources Authorityfrom which Boston buys its waterpurchased conservation land in the watersheds that feed the Quabbin and Wachusett reservoirs to the citys west, the sources of Bostons water.
Not surprisingly, the citys path to its current water purity was no walk in the park. In the early 80s, the filthy state of the Boston Harbor made national news and the Conservation Law Foundation sued state agencies for violating the Massachusetts Clean Water Act. One result of the litigation was the formation in 1985 of the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority.
On top of the billions the authority spent on restoring the Boston Harbor and Charles Riverresulting in some of the cleanest urban beaches in the countryit invested $131 million in land preservation around Bostons drinking water sources. Four hundred square miles of forest makes a protective ring around the citys two major reservoirs.
--
I remember the MWRA starting their cleanup in the mid-80s. (I also remember my water bill took a large hit.)
The Charles River was disgusting, as was the smell of the water from the tap.
The Deer Island water treatment plant was built:
30 years of taking care if our infrastructure has paid off.
Why Boston Has the Best Tasting Tap Water in the Nation
http://www.alternet.org/why-boston-has-best-tasting-tap-water-nationNew Yorkers may disagree but Beantown's environmental protection efforts are its water's secret ingredient.
Why Boston Has the Best Tasting Tap Water in the Nation
By Daniel Moss
June 23, 2014
If you already love Boston for its unmistakable accent and unpredictable baseball team, you might want to consider adding its tap water to your list. Boston came out on top of this years tap water taste test, an annual competition hosted by the American Water Works Associationa network of more than 50,000 water professionals charged with keeping our water supply healthy. The honor was particularly fitting since the associations conference was held in Boston this year.
Forests in the protected area clean the water naturally so that by the time it gets to the city it requires only limited filtering. Theres no need for the cocktail of chemicals most cities water utilities use.Bostons secret ingredient? Watershed protection. Between 1985 and 2012, the Massachusetts Water Resources Authorityfrom which Boston buys its waterpurchased conservation land in the watersheds that feed the Quabbin and Wachusett reservoirs to the citys west, the sources of Bostons water.
Not surprisingly, the citys path to its current water purity was no walk in the park. In the early 80s, the filthy state of the Boston Harbor made national news and the Conservation Law Foundation sued state agencies for violating the Massachusetts Clean Water Act. One result of the litigation was the formation in 1985 of the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority.
On top of the billions the authority spent on restoring the Boston Harbor and Charles Riverresulting in some of the cleanest urban beaches in the countryit invested $131 million in land preservation around Bostons drinking water sources. Four hundred square miles of forest makes a protective ring around the citys two major reservoirs.
--
I remember the MWRA starting their cleanup in the mid-80s. (I also remember my water bill took a large hit.)
The Charles River was disgusting, as was the smell of the water from the tap.
The Deer Island water treatment plant was built:
30 years of taking care if our infrastructure has paid off.
June 24, 2014
Iraqi Turkmen pose with their weapons as they ready to fight against militants led by the jihadist Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) on June 21, 2014, in the Iraqi village of Basheer, south of Kirkuk
Iraq's Destruction Is a Reminder of the Ugly Face of American Empire
By Chris Hedges
June 23, 2014
The black-clad fighters of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, sweeping a collapsing army and terrified Iraqis before them as they advance toward Baghdad, reflect back to us the ghoulish face of American empire. They are the specters of the hundreds of thousands of people we murdered in our deluded quest to remake the Middle East. They are ghosts from the innumerable roadsides and villages where U.S. soldiers and Marines, jolted by explosions of improvised explosive devices, responded with indiscriminate fire. They are the risen remains of the dismembered Iraqis left behind by blasts of Hellfire and cruise missiles, howitzers, grenade launchers and drone strikes. They are the avengers of the gruesome torture and the sexual debasement that often came with being detained by American troops. They are the final answer to the collective humiliation of an occupied country, the logical outcome of Shock and Awe, the Frankenstein monster stitched together from the body parts we left scattered on the ground. They are what we get for the $4 trillion we wasted on the Iraq War.
The language of violence engenders violence. The language of hate engenders hate. I and the public know what all schoolchildren learn, W.H. Auden wrote. Those to whom evil is done do evil in return. It is as old as the Bible.
There is no fight left in us. The war is over. We destroyed Iraq as a unified country. It will never be put back together. We are reducedin what must be an act of divine justice decreed by the gods, whom we have discovered to our dismay are Islamicto pleading with Iran for military assistance to shield the corrupt and despised U.S. protectorate led by Nouri al-Maliki. We are not, as we thought when we entered Iraq, the omnipotent superpower able in a swift and brutal stroke to bend a people to our will. We are something else. Fools and murderers. Blinded by hubris. Faded relics of the Cold War. And now, in the final act of the play, we are crawling away. Our empire is dying.
We should have heeded, while we had a chance, the wails of mothers and fathers. We should have listened to the cries of the wounded. We should have wept over the bodies of Iraqi children lined up in neat rows in the morgues. We should have honored grief so we could honor life. But the dance of death is intoxicating. Once it begins you whirl in an ecstatic frenzy. Deaths embrace, which feels at first like sexual lust, tightens and tightens until you suffocate. Now the music has stopped. All we have left are loss and pain.
Iraq's Destruction Is a Reminder of the Ugly Face of American Empire
http://www.alternet.org/world/iraqs-destruction-reminder-ugly-face-american-empireIraqi Turkmen pose with their weapons as they ready to fight against militants led by the jihadist Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) on June 21, 2014, in the Iraqi village of Basheer, south of Kirkuk
Iraq's Destruction Is a Reminder of the Ugly Face of American Empire
By Chris Hedges
June 23, 2014
The black-clad fighters of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, sweeping a collapsing army and terrified Iraqis before them as they advance toward Baghdad, reflect back to us the ghoulish face of American empire. They are the specters of the hundreds of thousands of people we murdered in our deluded quest to remake the Middle East. They are ghosts from the innumerable roadsides and villages where U.S. soldiers and Marines, jolted by explosions of improvised explosive devices, responded with indiscriminate fire. They are the risen remains of the dismembered Iraqis left behind by blasts of Hellfire and cruise missiles, howitzers, grenade launchers and drone strikes. They are the avengers of the gruesome torture and the sexual debasement that often came with being detained by American troops. They are the final answer to the collective humiliation of an occupied country, the logical outcome of Shock and Awe, the Frankenstein monster stitched together from the body parts we left scattered on the ground. They are what we get for the $4 trillion we wasted on the Iraq War.
The language of violence engenders violence. The language of hate engenders hate. I and the public know what all schoolchildren learn, W.H. Auden wrote. Those to whom evil is done do evil in return. It is as old as the Bible.
There is no fight left in us. The war is over. We destroyed Iraq as a unified country. It will never be put back together. We are reducedin what must be an act of divine justice decreed by the gods, whom we have discovered to our dismay are Islamicto pleading with Iran for military assistance to shield the corrupt and despised U.S. protectorate led by Nouri al-Maliki. We are not, as we thought when we entered Iraq, the omnipotent superpower able in a swift and brutal stroke to bend a people to our will. We are something else. Fools and murderers. Blinded by hubris. Faded relics of the Cold War. And now, in the final act of the play, we are crawling away. Our empire is dying.
We should have heeded, while we had a chance, the wails of mothers and fathers. We should have listened to the cries of the wounded. We should have wept over the bodies of Iraqi children lined up in neat rows in the morgues. We should have honored grief so we could honor life. But the dance of death is intoxicating. Once it begins you whirl in an ecstatic frenzy. Deaths embrace, which feels at first like sexual lust, tightens and tightens until you suffocate. Now the music has stopped. All we have left are loss and pain.
June 23, 2014
'By denying water service to thousands, Detroit is violating the human right to water.'
Blue Planet et al. Appeal to UN over Detroit Water cut-off to Thousands
By contributors | Jun. 23, 2014
By Sarah Lazare
As thousands of people in Detroit go without water, and the city moves to cut off services to tens of thousands more, concerned organizations have taken the unusual step of appealing to the United Nations to intervene and protect the "human right to water."
After decades of policies that put businesses and profits ahead of the public good, the city now has a major crisis on its hands," said Maude Barlow, founder of Blue Planet Project and board chair of Food & Water Watch, in a statement. By denying water service to thousands, Detroit is violating the human right to water."
The Submission to the Special Rapporteur was released Wednesday by the Detroit Peoples Water Board, the Blue Planet Project, the Michigan Welfare Rights Organization and Food & Water Watch.
It calls for the "state of Michigan and U.S. government to respect the human right to water and sanitation" and for shut-offs to be halted, services restored, and water to be made accessible and affordable.
Blue Planet et al. Appeal to UN over Detroit Water cut-off to Thousands
http://www.juancole.com/2014/06/planet-detroit-thousands.html'By denying water service to thousands, Detroit is violating the human right to water.'
Blue Planet et al. Appeal to UN over Detroit Water cut-off to Thousands
By contributors | Jun. 23, 2014
By Sarah Lazare
As thousands of people in Detroit go without water, and the city moves to cut off services to tens of thousands more, concerned organizations have taken the unusual step of appealing to the United Nations to intervene and protect the "human right to water."
After decades of policies that put businesses and profits ahead of the public good, the city now has a major crisis on its hands," said Maude Barlow, founder of Blue Planet Project and board chair of Food & Water Watch, in a statement. By denying water service to thousands, Detroit is violating the human right to water."
The Submission to the Special Rapporteur was released Wednesday by the Detroit Peoples Water Board, the Blue Planet Project, the Michigan Welfare Rights Organization and Food & Water Watch.
It calls for the "state of Michigan and U.S. government to respect the human right to water and sanitation" and for shut-offs to be halted, services restored, and water to be made accessible and affordable.
June 23, 2014
Afghanistan and the Artificial US War on Terror (Anand Gopals New Book)
By Juan Cole | Jun. 23, 2014
I guest-hosted a book salon over at Firedoglake on Sunday concentrating on Anand Gopals expose of the so-called war on terror in Afghanistan. Below is my review of the book. Do go to FDL to read the whole salon, where Mr. Gopal was kind enough to answer our questions about the book and the subject.
No Good Men Among the Living: America, the Taliban, and the War through Afghan Eyes
Anand Gopals No Good Men Among the Living is a deconstruction of the American War on Terror as it pertained to Afghanistan. It is an argument that the US military allowed itself to fall into chasing phantoms, put up to search and destroy missions by tribal allies mainly interested in using the Americans to settle feuds and deflect rivals. They got drawn into what anthropologists call the segmentary lineage political system of rural Afghanistan.
In short, as Gopal tells the story, there was no Taliban activity in Afghanistan to speak of by 2002, but the US military machine required an enemy, and its clients among the men on the make in Karzais Afghanistan were glad to supply alleged Taliban (sometimes even tagging as such men who had spent a decade fighting the puritanical seminarians). In the course of these betrayals and injustices, the US managed actually to create a growing Taliban resistance to its presence in the country. The book is a 21st century Catch-22, and as with the original, is leavened by episodes of dark humor and profound irony.
Afghanistan and the Artificial US War on Terror (Anand Gopal’s New Book)
http://www.juancole.com/2014/06/afghanistan-artificial-terror.htmlAfghanistan and the Artificial US War on Terror (Anand Gopals New Book)
By Juan Cole | Jun. 23, 2014
I guest-hosted a book salon over at Firedoglake on Sunday concentrating on Anand Gopals expose of the so-called war on terror in Afghanistan. Below is my review of the book. Do go to FDL to read the whole salon, where Mr. Gopal was kind enough to answer our questions about the book and the subject.
No Good Men Among the Living: America, the Taliban, and the War through Afghan Eyes
Anand Gopals No Good Men Among the Living is a deconstruction of the American War on Terror as it pertained to Afghanistan. It is an argument that the US military allowed itself to fall into chasing phantoms, put up to search and destroy missions by tribal allies mainly interested in using the Americans to settle feuds and deflect rivals. They got drawn into what anthropologists call the segmentary lineage political system of rural Afghanistan.
In short, as Gopal tells the story, there was no Taliban activity in Afghanistan to speak of by 2002, but the US military machine required an enemy, and its clients among the men on the make in Karzais Afghanistan were glad to supply alleged Taliban (sometimes even tagging as such men who had spent a decade fighting the puritanical seminarians). In the course of these betrayals and injustices, the US managed actually to create a growing Taliban resistance to its presence in the country. The book is a 21st century Catch-22, and as with the original, is leavened by episodes of dark humor and profound irony.
June 22, 2014
Republicans: Never Wrong About Anything
by Jaime O'Neill | June 21, 2014 - 9:38am
They say that if you live long enough, youll see everything. But Im beginning to doubt Ill live long enough to hear a Republican say theyve ever been wrong about anything. Remember that disastrous war in Iraq, the one that put so many young men and women in VA hospitals, the one that was never funded, that ballooned our national debt, all while doing nothing at all good for our nation?
That was the war where we were going to be greeted as liberators, the one the neo-cons promised would be a cakewalk. That was the war we were lied into fighting, with whoppers like this one from Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, when he said: "We do know that the Iraqi regime has chemical and biological weapons...including VX, sarin, cyclosarin and mustard gas. ...large, clandestine stockpiles of biological weaponsincluding anthrax and botulism toxin, and possibly smallpox."
That lie was compounded by Bush II (George the Dim-Witted) who blamed 9/11 on a nation that had absolutely nothing to do with that attack (and he knew it). Still, he told us this bald-faced lie: ... for the sake of protecting our friends and allies, the United States will lead a mighty coalition of freedom-loving nations and disarm Saddam Hussein. See, I can't imagine what was going through the mind of this enemy when they hit us. They probably thought the national religion was materialism, that we were so selfish and so self-absorbed that after 9/11/2001 this mighty nation would take a couple of steps back and file a lawsuit.
Instead, he launched a hasty and ill-planned invasion, putting soldiers at unnecessary risk because, according to Rumsfeld, you go to war with the army you have, not with the army you want. There was no urgency, no clear and present danger, but we went ahead and sent troops into Baghdad in very expensive but unarmored Humvees, and lots of those soldiers suffered unnecessary deaths or life-changing injuries because Dubya, Cheney, and Rummy wanted to hurry things up.
Republicans: Never Wrong About Anything
http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/jaime-oneill/56522/republicans-never-wrong-about-anythingRepublicans: Never Wrong About Anything
by Jaime O'Neill | June 21, 2014 - 9:38am
They say that if you live long enough, youll see everything. But Im beginning to doubt Ill live long enough to hear a Republican say theyve ever been wrong about anything. Remember that disastrous war in Iraq, the one that put so many young men and women in VA hospitals, the one that was never funded, that ballooned our national debt, all while doing nothing at all good for our nation?
That was the war where we were going to be greeted as liberators, the one the neo-cons promised would be a cakewalk. That was the war we were lied into fighting, with whoppers like this one from Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, when he said: "We do know that the Iraqi regime has chemical and biological weapons...including VX, sarin, cyclosarin and mustard gas. ...large, clandestine stockpiles of biological weaponsincluding anthrax and botulism toxin, and possibly smallpox."
That lie was compounded by Bush II (George the Dim-Witted) who blamed 9/11 on a nation that had absolutely nothing to do with that attack (and he knew it). Still, he told us this bald-faced lie: ... for the sake of protecting our friends and allies, the United States will lead a mighty coalition of freedom-loving nations and disarm Saddam Hussein. See, I can't imagine what was going through the mind of this enemy when they hit us. They probably thought the national religion was materialism, that we were so selfish and so self-absorbed that after 9/11/2001 this mighty nation would take a couple of steps back and file a lawsuit.
Instead, he launched a hasty and ill-planned invasion, putting soldiers at unnecessary risk because, according to Rumsfeld, you go to war with the army you have, not with the army you want. There was no urgency, no clear and present danger, but we went ahead and sent troops into Baghdad in very expensive but unarmored Humvees, and lots of those soldiers suffered unnecessary deaths or life-changing injuries because Dubya, Cheney, and Rummy wanted to hurry things up.
Profile Information
Member since: Wed Mar 16, 2005, 11:12 AMNumber of posts: 60,364