Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Faryn Balyncd
Faryn Balyncd's Journal
Faryn Balyncd's Journal
November 27, 2014
Seven Reasons Police Brutality Is Systemic, Not Anecdotal
...the plural of anecdote is not data, and the media is inevitably drawn toward tales of conflict. Despite the increasing frequency with which we hear of misbehaving cops, many Americans maintain a default respect for the man in uniform. As an NYPD assistant chief put it, We dont want a few bad apples or a few rogue cops damaging the polices good name.
This is an attractive proposal, certainly, but unfortunately it doesnt hold up to scrutiny.
Here are seven reasons why police misconduct is a systemic problem, not a few bad apples:
1. Many departments dont provide adequate training in nonviolent solutions.
This is particularly obvious when it comes to dealing with family pets. Police kill family dog is practically its own subgenre of police brutality reports, and most of these caseslike the story of the Minnesota children who were made to sit, handcuffed, next to their dead and bleeding petare all too preventable. Some police departments have begun to train their officers to deal more appropriately with pets, but Thomas Aveni of the Police Policy Studies Council, a police consulting firm, says its still extremely rare. In the absence of this training, police are less likely to view violence as a last resort.
2. . . .
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/seven-reasons-police-brutality-is-systematic-not-anecdotal/
Seven Reasons Police Brutality Is Systemic, Not Anecdotal
Seven Reasons Police Brutality Is Systemic, Not Anecdotal
...the plural of anecdote is not data, and the media is inevitably drawn toward tales of conflict. Despite the increasing frequency with which we hear of misbehaving cops, many Americans maintain a default respect for the man in uniform. As an NYPD assistant chief put it, We dont want a few bad apples or a few rogue cops damaging the polices good name.
This is an attractive proposal, certainly, but unfortunately it doesnt hold up to scrutiny.
Here are seven reasons why police misconduct is a systemic problem, not a few bad apples:
1. Many departments dont provide adequate training in nonviolent solutions.
This is particularly obvious when it comes to dealing with family pets. Police kill family dog is practically its own subgenre of police brutality reports, and most of these caseslike the story of the Minnesota children who were made to sit, handcuffed, next to their dead and bleeding petare all too preventable. Some police departments have begun to train their officers to deal more appropriately with pets, but Thomas Aveni of the Police Policy Studies Council, a police consulting firm, says its still extremely rare. In the absence of this training, police are less likely to view violence as a last resort.
2. . . .
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/seven-reasons-police-brutality-is-systematic-not-anecdotal/
November 27, 2014
Two Seconds
"....Watch the video. Again, there is no audio, but how on earth can anybody order someone to raise his hands three times in two seconds? Thats how long it took from the time the police car stopped until Rice was lying on the ground, mortally wounded.
What you see is not always what you get, so we need to wait for the investigation. But this looks very, very bad for the Cleveland police. From the look of things on this video, that kid barely had time to react to the sudden appearance of a police car before he was on the ground with one or more bullets inside of him....
....there is virtually no time at all between the police car stopping and the officer shooting Tamir Rice. Its hard to see what Rice was doing with his hands when the car stopped; maybe the police feared that he was about to shoot them. Still two seconds? Really? This looks very, very wrong to me. In fact, this looks outrageous. I dont blame people one bit for protesting this.
The cops last name is Loehmann. A pretty safe bet hes white."
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/two-seconds-tamir-rice/
American Conservative: "Two Seconds. How long it took to kill Tamir Rice." (VIDEO)
Two Seconds
"....Watch the video. Again, there is no audio, but how on earth can anybody order someone to raise his hands three times in two seconds? Thats how long it took from the time the police car stopped until Rice was lying on the ground, mortally wounded.
What you see is not always what you get, so we need to wait for the investigation. But this looks very, very bad for the Cleveland police. From the look of things on this video, that kid barely had time to react to the sudden appearance of a police car before he was on the ground with one or more bullets inside of him....
....there is virtually no time at all between the police car stopping and the officer shooting Tamir Rice. Its hard to see what Rice was doing with his hands when the car stopped; maybe the police feared that he was about to shoot them. Still two seconds? Really? This looks very, very wrong to me. In fact, this looks outrageous. I dont blame people one bit for protesting this.
The cops last name is Loehmann. A pretty safe bet hes white."
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/two-seconds-tamir-rice/
Profile Information
Member since: Wed Nov 23, 2005, 09:15 AMNumber of posts: 5,125