HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Stuart G » Journal
Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 25 Next »

Stuart G

Profile Information

Gender: Male
Hometown: no where
Current location: ????
Member since: Tue Dec 18, 2007, 12:07 PM
Number of posts: 31,713

About Me

I thought I knew a lot, and I found out... how little I knew about what I know. And how much more there is to learn, if I listen and read what others have to say.

Journal Archives

Huff Post..beyond a rag, beyond slanted shit..disgusting display of poor taste, no taste, no shame.

Today it had a picture on its front page...of a 1000 pound woman. I didn't understand it. I had never seen anything like that ever..
What is this doing there?.Is this legit?.Is the picture real???..why put this up..?

Even the National Enquirer does not go there, not on the front page...But the Huff Post goes there..This is just another kind
of pornography that insults and disgusts..This is my last mention that site ever...done.

Hunch..call it intuition.

I think Romney will make another big mistake. Who knows when, why, or what..It seems likely to happen and then, I think the polls will start to change again, in our direction for good

A true classic toon..Babbit and Costello.."A tale of two kittens"..introducing a tiny little bird #4

Although this was a take off on two great comedians..it did introduce for the first time..
a tiny little bird ...everyone likes this one...please watch...1942

Slanted Shit..Huff Post..Sucks..worse..

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/

Eight Pictures of Romney..Three of Obama, none alone of Obama..
Six of Romney alone...
...count them yourself..I am sure it is the same over most of the media..


More than 40 years ago, I recall reading about the coverage of Eisenhower vs Stevanson in 1956..Someone did a study and then, at the New York Times, after the author did all kinds of comparisons, said it was over two months almost the same..placement of picutres..size, column inches...etc.

Fuck the Huff Post..and most of the Mainstream Media..

hugs for DU ...
at least we don't claim to be fair....

No more reports on Huff Post..assholes...AOL.
done..

Biden ..

He has had years of outstanding debates.

. Knows what he needs to do...will be up against a pathological liar..and...he will ..
in my opinion, take all his experience and sensitivity for us, and...
tear into this asshole like you have never seen anyone torn into before....he will not be kind, or stand back..
..Biden is one the 47 percent and so are we...Ryan will not know what hit him..for weeks afterwards...


.Biden knows what Ryan is..and so do we......................

Tom and Jerry ..cartoon #3...Yankee Doodle Mouse...Academy Award..1943

Krugman: The Truth About Jobs.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/08/opinion/krugman-truth-about-jobs.html?hp

October 7..


If anyone had doubts about the madness that has spread through a large part of the American political spectrum, the reaction to Friday’s better-than expected report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics should have settled the issue. For the immediate response of many on the right — and we’re not just talking fringe figures — was to cry conspiracy.

Leading the charge of what were quickly dubbed the “B.L.S. truthers” was none other than Jack Welch, the former chairman of General Electric, who posted an assertion on Twitter that the books had been cooked to help President Obama’s re-election campaign. His claim was quickly picked up by right-wing pundits and media personalities.

It was nonsense, of course. Job numbers are prepared by professional civil servants, at an agency that currently has no political appointees. But then maybe Mr. Welch — under whose leadership G.E. reported remarkably smooth earnings growth, with none of the short-term fluctuations you might have expected (fluctuations that reappeared under his successor) — doesn’t know how hard it would be to cook the jobs data.

Furthermore, the methods the bureau uses are public — and anyone familiar with the data understands that they are “noisy,” that especially good (or bad) months will be reported now and then as a simple consequence of statistical randomness. And that in turn means that you shouldn’t put much weight on any one month’s report.

Huffington Post..sucks..big time..

For three days it has had an ugly picture of Elizabeth Warren on its front page..

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/

For two days, it has one of the ugliest pictures I have ever seen of New Jersey governor Christie..
in exactly the same pose as Warren..You have to scroll down some, but both pictures are on the same page, one is ugliar than the other.
It is this subtle and not so subtle kind of shit at the Huffington Post that proves to me they really are against Warren..the story about Warren from the link, has nothing to do with the picture...

It is no mistake that those pictures have been up there for so long...none, because some pictures get taken off within a few hours..they edit that thing several times a day...

I go there to see what the main stream media is" doing"..But I got to hold back the vomit when I look at the pictures...
some of the stories and writers are ok..but they are a rag..tool of the AOL.

Today's Cartoon. #2........Duck Amuck...one of the funiest ever made...

&feature=related

Which is Worse...Huff Post or NBC .com?

These are both awful. Both slanted against us, although they make appearances to be unbiased.

This headline was repeated 3 times at NBC.com today..(Sunday)

Romney gets personal at Florida Rally..

Huffunton Post mentioned Romeny 7 or 8 times on its front page, Obama once..I am assuming that Sunday is their most viewed day..
I have noticed this a lot on Sunday..number of mentions and pic of Romney outnumber Obama..

?????
Go to Page: « Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 25 Next »