Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DWC

DWC's Journal
DWC's Journal
March 2, 2012

Oh, you were clear. Clearly Wrong - Again.

You really meant "into the grocery store" ?!?!

Now THAT really is a Load of B.S.

Concerning the other points addressed: You know virtually nothing about me or any other person in this group whatever their stated position on the issue. Your continued assumptions concerning others really do devalue your input to zero minus a bunch.

Semper Fi,

March 1, 2012

Get off the"The Children" Crap !!

This guy is 17 years old. My uncle was 17 years old and an infantryman on D-Day at Normandy.

"The Children" card might be played up to maybe age 12. After that it is simply B.S.

Semper Fi,


February 12, 2012

Because a law abiding, responsible citizen

is law abiding and responsible, that citizen will determine for themselves the type and amount of firearms training they individually need.

An individual owning, carrying, deploying, and/or using a firearm is not a group exercise. It is specific to the individual. Always has been. Always will be.

If owning, carrying, deploying, and/or use of forearms became illegal, only LAW ABIDING citizens would be disarmed. RESPONSIBLE citizens would continue to arm themselves, prepared to face the consequences of their actions if necessary.

"It is better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6"

Semper Fi,

Profile Information

Gender: Male
Hometown: Central Texas
Home country: USA
Member since: Fri Jan 1, 2010, 11:54 PM
Number of posts: 911
Latest Discussions»DWC's Journal