Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
sarisataka
sarisataka's Journal
sarisataka's Journal
July 31, 2013
California Attorney General says feds not exempt from state ‘safe’ handgun law (with poll)
California Attorney General Kamala Harris has determined federal agents are not covered by an exemption that allows California law enforcement officers to purchase unsafe handguns denied to non-LEOs.
The AG says the feds can only buy firearms listed on the Roster of Handguns Certified for Sale (like the rest of us), attorney Chuck Michel wrote on CalGunLaws.com.
While it may sound absurd on the surface to allow police officers to walk around with guns the state has deemed unsafe, the language is deceptive. Theyre not talking about things like guns that blow up in your hand due to faulty design, material defects or workmanship.
To not be considered unsafe, handguns must pass performance tests and have certain features that (in theory only) make the firearms allegedly safer, Michel explained. Most problematic for the California public is the recent development that before any semiautomatic pistol can be added to the Roster of guns approved for sale they must be equipped with microstamping technology.
http://www.examiner.com/article/california-attorney-general-says-feds-not-exempt-from-state-safe-handgun-law?cid=rss
The AG says the feds can only buy firearms listed on the Roster of Handguns Certified for Sale (like the rest of us), attorney Chuck Michel wrote on CalGunLaws.com.
While it may sound absurd on the surface to allow police officers to walk around with guns the state has deemed unsafe, the language is deceptive. Theyre not talking about things like guns that blow up in your hand due to faulty design, material defects or workmanship.
To not be considered unsafe, handguns must pass performance tests and have certain features that (in theory only) make the firearms allegedly safer, Michel explained. Most problematic for the California public is the recent development that before any semiautomatic pistol can be added to the Roster of guns approved for sale they must be equipped with microstamping technology.
July 31, 2013
http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local/east_bay&id=9190517
So are hammers a freedom of speech issue or is the council looking at the wrong tools?
Oakland considering ban on violent tools at protests
Oakland considering ban on violent tools at protests
Tuesday, July 30, 2013
OAKLAND, Calif. -- A proposal to ban hammers, wrenches, shields, sling shots, paint projectiles and other potentially destructive items at protests will be considered by the Oakland City Council at its meeting on Tuesday night.
The ordinance prohibiting so-called "tools of violence and vandalism" during a demonstration is being proposed by Councilman Noel Gallo, who said in a letter to his colleagues that it's designed to counter violence that occurred during recent protests against the acquittal of George Zimmerman in the fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin in Florida.
Gallo said the damage to businesses in downtown Oakland and the adjacent Chinatown district included broken windows, graffiti and arson. In addition, a waiter at the restaurant Flora was hit in the face with a hammer, he said.
Gallo said the ordinance is needed because "the Oakland Police Department needs additional tools to help protect life and property in our city."
Tuesday, July 30, 2013
OAKLAND, Calif. -- A proposal to ban hammers, wrenches, shields, sling shots, paint projectiles and other potentially destructive items at protests will be considered by the Oakland City Council at its meeting on Tuesday night.
The ordinance prohibiting so-called "tools of violence and vandalism" during a demonstration is being proposed by Councilman Noel Gallo, who said in a letter to his colleagues that it's designed to counter violence that occurred during recent protests against the acquittal of George Zimmerman in the fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin in Florida.
Gallo said the damage to businesses in downtown Oakland and the adjacent Chinatown district included broken windows, graffiti and arson. In addition, a waiter at the restaurant Flora was hit in the face with a hammer, he said.
Gallo said the ordinance is needed because "the Oakland Police Department needs additional tools to help protect life and property in our city."
http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/local/east_bay&id=9190517
So are hammers a freedom of speech issue or is the council looking at the wrong tools?
Profile Information
Gender: MaleHometown: St Paul MN
Home country: USA
Current location: Here
Member since: Wed Mar 21, 2012, 10:41 PM
Number of posts: 18,651