Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search


giftedgirl77's Journal
giftedgirl77's Journal
February 28, 2016

They are rolling on the AA group hard.

Just give them the torches & pitchforks & they can complete the image.

January 24, 2014

WI teacher refused to accept award from Paul Ryan

This is apparently not NEW (must be a slow news day). My bad

During a ceremony last week in Wisconsin, a teacher outright refused to accept a reward from Rep. Paul Ryan, saying he couldn’t do so “in good conscience” because of the GOP congressman’s politics.

Al Levie, a high school social studies teacher, was one of three recipients of a Martin Luther King Jr. humanitarian award during a celebration honoring the late civil rights leader. Ryan, who represents the district, attended the ceremony and presented congressional recognitions to each award winner.

According to a report from the Kenosha News:

After Ryan spoke, Levie criticized the congressman’s policies before being walked off the stage. Levie had earlier stated that he would like to see collective bargaining restored in Wisconsin, fair immigration reform and a fair tax system among other suggestions.


His words aren’t audible, but according to the video’s captions he said, “I can’t in good conscience accept this award, as a humanitarian, Paul Ryan stands for everything I don’t believe in.”

“I would not accept the award from Paul Ryan because Paul Ryan is a lackey for the 1 percent,” Levie later says in the video.

“Paul Ryan had no business at a Martin Luther King event, it’s totally hypocritical. On the one hand he votes to slash health care, while on the other hand, King dedicated his life and he died for it — for people to have adequate healthcare, to have adequate jobs.”


Good for him, more people need to start calling these asses out, make them go back under the rocks they came out from under.

Video at link


June 19, 2013

FISA & EPCA the facts & nothing more

I have been watching the madness unfold regarding Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and the allegations that US Citizens are being illegally monitored & investigated by these Intel agencies yet so far nothing has been provided to substantiate these allegations. Both FISA and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) both clearly outline what the legal parameters are as well as the procedures.

As to the allegations that the US Government is illegally data-mining our call logs. The Supreme Court has ruled in States v. Miller, 442 U.S. 735, 741-46 (1979), that customers do not have a 4th Amendment right to protected expectation to privacy and that no warrant was required for these documents if it was merely identified the number the call originated from and the destination number. Furthermore the court held the customer had no justifiable expectation of privacy in information which he knew or should have known the telephone company might ordinarily capture for billing or service purposes. As such, claiming your constitutional rights have been violated because of this action alone is a moot point and was decided by SCOTUS 34 years ago.

Conducting surveillance on US Citizens: FISA subsection 702(b) specifically outlines the intelligence gathering on everyone not just people outside the US. This section has several limitations on the acquisitions on these targets and are as follows: 1) may not intentionally target any person known at the time of acquisition to be located in the United States; 2) may not intentionally target a person reasonably believed to be located outside the United States if the purpose of such acquisition is to target a particular,
known person reasonably believed to be in the United States; 3) may not intentionally target a U.S. person reasonably believed to be located outside the United States; 4 ) may not intentionally acquire any communication as to which the sender and all intended recipients are known at the time of the acquisition to be located in the United States; and 5) must be conducted in a manner consistent with the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Finally, the EPCA also protects everyone's emails, voice-mails, and another electronic communications, the gov can't obtain/maintain or read, without a real warrant, FISA only used for Foreign Intel. I know this is a hot topic but there really are laws in place that prevent any violations of our 4th Amendment rights when it comes to intelligence gathering. These laws govern all entities that gather Intel for us & it is all prosecutable & people do get prosecuted for misusing the access they are given.

Re-authorization of FISA http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/intel/R42725.pdf
Privacy: An Overview of Federal Statutes Governing Wiretapping and Electronic Eavesdropping http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/98-326_20121009.pdf

Profile Information

Gender: Female
Home country: USA
Current location: SC
Member since: Mon May 13, 2013, 09:43 PM
Number of posts: 4,713
Latest Discussions»giftedgirl77's Journal