Garrett78
Garrett78's JournalThe racial wealth gap "worsens political and economic outcomes for the entire country."
I've written before about how social justice encompasses economic justice, which runs counter to the understanding of many. So, of course social justice and economic justice both matter, but not quite for the reason some seem to think. The latter is one component of the former.
I wrote about how it's important to have a proper appreciation for how historical injustices (both race-based and sex-based) continue to impact the present if one hopes to win the Democratic Party nomination. Institutional/structural racism and sexism (both past and present) continues to impact wealth/assets, advancement opportunities, access to certain jobs and schools, access to housing, loan contracts, dealings with law enforcement, court proceedings, health, and on and on and on.
As the subtitle to The Case for Reparations by Ta-Nehisi Coates reads, "Two hundred fifty years of slavery. Ninety years of Jim Crow. Sixty years of separate but equal. Thirty-five years of racist housing policy. Until we reckon with our compounding moral debts, America will never be whole."
I've also pointed out that the vast majority of Trump supporters are Birthers, which should make clear how absurd it is to suggest that only a fraction of his supporters are motivated by white identity. Not to mention the abundance of other clues.
And I've most recently written about the dog whistling that's behind |the "working class whites" narrative, about how Democrats need to create a new narrative and not further the existing one.
Now, I'm encouraging everyone to read an article on just how stark the racial wealth gap is and why addressing it, specifically, matters. Excerpts follow:
Much of that disparity comes from the gap in the home values in white neighborhoods versus the neighborhoods where people of color live. The roots of the gulf stem at least as far back as the 1934 National Housing Act, which redlined black neighborhoods, marking them as credit risks. Though redlining was outlawed in the 60s, the effect persists today in the form of neighborhoods consisting mostly of people of color that have high poverty rates, low home values and declining infrastructure.
Discriminatory lending also exists today: Mortgages obtained by households of color tend to have higher interest rates.
Other factors stem back to homeownership and education: A child whose parents were steered into a low-income neighborhood with a low-quality school has decreased chances of obtaining a four-year degree, which also then cuts off future job opportunities. Additionally, although it is illegal, discrimination on the basis of race or national origin endures, whether unconsciously or overtly.
Those who are truly concerned with wealth inequality will grasp that the "rising tide lifts all boats" approach is insufficient.
Why draw a distinction between the working class and the white working class?
Is it because people think working class is synonymous with white? Is it that the dog whistle, implying persons of color don't work, has infiltrated your consciousness?
Or is it because you realize a portion of working class whites (though certainly not all) have much different priorities or desires than the working class as a whole?
If it's the latter, why do you suppose that might be?
I suppose some might say it's "geographical," as if there aren't millions of working class persons of color in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, etc. Not to mention all of the working class whites in those states that undoubtedly voted for Clinton. Again, we're talking about a portion of working class whites. So, again I ask, why does that segment have much different priorities or desires?
Profile Information
Member since: Wed Aug 19, 2015, 04:47 AMNumber of posts: 10,721