Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HeartachesNhangovers

HeartachesNhangovers's Journal
HeartachesNhangovers's Journal
February 21, 2018

First, ban all government agencies and their

employees on US soil from possessing NFA weapons (fully-automatic firearms, short-barreled rifles, suppressors, etc). Also, no "destructive devices" (explosives, etc). No exceptions, with violations punishable as felonies, and do it on a federal basis, of course.

After all, the government has no legitimate interest in killing as many Americans as possible as quickly as possible. To the extent that police agencies "need" military weapons, it is because they have adopted tactics based on overwhelming firepower, rather than containment, negotiation and patience.

Then, once government agencies have been stripped of these weapons, demonstrating that these weapons are not necessary, I believe that a lot of the copy-cat demand from the public will dry up.

If that works out, ban the government from having magazines with greater than 10-round capacity, semi-automatic pistols and rifles, etc BEFORE trying to do it to the public.

After all, government agents don't carry weapons to protect you, they carry them to protect themselves, and that's how they almost always USE those weapons - to eliminate perceived threats against themselves.

As long as government agents are allowed to carry any weapon under the sun and as long as they are clearly using them for their own self-defense, it's a losing argument that the public shouldn't be entitled to the same level of protection.

Disarming the government is the only realistic path to general US disarmament.

February 4, 2018

Regardless of the tax situation, companies typically have

growth and/or profitability targets for their manufacturing and retail facilities. If a retail store consistently under-performs - because of high operating costs (rent, security, labor, etc) or low sales - it gets closed. Similarly, if a manufacturing facility under-performs, it gets upgraded, re-purposed or closed.

The tax situation doesn't affect this fundamental process of chasing growth and profits.

Profile Information

Gender: Do not display
Hometown: West Coast
Home country: USA
Current location: West Coast
Member since: Thu Dec 15, 2016, 04:35 PM
Number of posts: 815
Latest Discussions»HeartachesNhangovers's Journal