The vote was not close.

https://twitter.com/bayraktar_1love/status/1595397872974970883

Why hasn't the US done this?

https://twitter.com/FrankAkino2/status/1595423251416637440

https://twitter.com/newsoneplace/status/1595423079756242944?t=tT1ImGof4MjghTetFq8r1w&s=19


ATACMS, F 16s now please. Why not more air defense systems? Give Ukraine the tools to win.

It's pretty funny. I'll post a couple of tweets.

https://twitter.com/7Veritas4/status/1595095547005878273


https://twitter.com/7Veritas4/status/1595063115435098116

https://twitter.com/7Veritas4/status/1594666809654910977?t=RhR8KgYBIZOq9T1o4L4bhw&s=19

IN Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin and Nevada.


Cited in Politico:
The two presidential nominees could start out in 2024 with as many as 46 states and D.C. sorted between the two parties. Brownstein argues that given recent trends, Democrats could start with a safe 260 electoral votes and Republicans with a safe 235 electoral votes. Under this scenario, longtime battleground states have become reliably red or blue. With Michigan and Pennsylvania seemingly back in Democratic hands, Florida and Ohio dominated by the GOP, sometimes-blue North Carolina out of reach for Democrats, and perennial GOP target New Hampshire out of reach for Republicans, the list of true toss-ups could be down to just four states worth 43 electoral votes: Nevada, Arizona, Georgia and Wisconsin.

The electoral college map is so closely divided that you can narrow down the decisive swing votes to a few pockets spread across those four states: “a miniscule number of people living in the tiny patches of contested political ground — white-collar suburbs of Atlanta and Phoenix, working-class Latino neighborhoods in and around Las Vegas and the mid-sized communities of the so-called BOW counties in Wisconsin.”

https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/22/politics/2022-preview-2024-presidential-election

HALIFAX, Nova Scotia — Congressional Republican leaders are on track to steamroll the growing number of conservative lawmakers who want to stop funding Ukraine’s war effort, a move that’s sure to intensify the GOP divide over U.S. support for Kyiv.

Interviews with lawmakers who traveled here for the Halifax International Security Forum, an annual pro-democracy conference, revealed that Congress is likely to allocate well more than the $38 billion the Biden administration requested for Ukraine’s military and economic needs as part of a year-end governing funding bill. And that extra infusion is set to advance with the help of senior Republicans, even as influential conservative groups urge a pause.


If Congress approves the White House’s request or super-sizes it, the U.S. commitment to Kyiv since Russia’s invasion began in February could top $100 billion by the end of the year — a massive sum that would throw a sharp elbow at Donald Trump-aligned Republicans who want to reevaluate U.S. policy toward Ukraine. But as questions swirl over the staying power of the Western coalition, lawmakers’ message here in Halifax was clear: Now is not the time to scale back the flow of weapons, equipment and humanitarian assistance to Ukraine.

The top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, who co-led the congressional delegation to the conference, downplayed the impact of neo-isolationists within his party and noted that the Hill’s most powerful GOP lawmakers firmly support additional aid.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/11/22/gop-ukraine-aid-halifax-00069709

https://twitter.com/BeschlossDC/status/1594709943025688576

https://twitter.com/Sigmund_Fellaud/status/1594271748509286400

Maybe it's just me but the whole thread had me in stitches.

https://twitter.com/MyrosiaM/status/1594298164990853122

https://twitter.com/UNICEF_UA/status/1594273929379577857


https://twitter.com/PatronDsns/status/1594276199806734336

https://twitter.com/ChrisMurphyCT/status/1593316596482772992