General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bernie Sanders talks universal Medicare, and 1.1 million people click to watch him [View all]Sophia4
(3,515 posts)in their medical lives, but its implementation and support and administrative costs are lower than those of our private insurance system.
Here is a very pro-private-insurance analysis of the administrative cost issue.
The experience in countries that have adopted single payer is that their overall costs are considerably lower than ours -- and I can say based on my experience living in four of those countries that their outcomes are better than ours and their care is great.
I recall that my husband at one time broke his leg in one of those countries. They hospitalized him for much, much longer than he would be hospitalized in the US. I would have preferred to have him at home although with two small children in the house maybe that wasn't a good idea. Still, I think that experience is not unusual and yet countries with single payer pay less for better long-term outcomes in health care than we do.
The cost of implementing and supporting single payer is included in the costs reflected on the websites that compare the prices that I mention above.
And the single payer insurance I had covered much more than the insurance we have here -- dental care for starts -- spas and other kinds of recovery for seconds.
The pharmaceuticals are cheaper if you have single payer that negotiates drug prices. There are a lot of savings with single payer.