Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A quick read of the Amended Stormy Daniels Complaint [View all]Ms. Toad
(34,069 posts)7. Not really my point
I was obliquely referring to the numerous fawning posts/threads about her attorney's legal abilities. Having read both the complaint, and the amended complaint, I'm not impressed with his legal abilities.
His PR savvy is another matter - unrelated to his legal abilities.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Under this argument, every NDA is problematic because it is a form of blackmail
EffieBlack
Mar 2018
#10
"when he first filed the suit, the campaign finance issue was floating around in the ether"
jberryhill
Mar 2018
#15
Interesting analysis - but I think the campaign finance argument is stronger than you do
EffieBlack
Mar 2018
#6
That still conflates the object of the contract with the means of performance
jberryhill
Mar 2018
#22
Whether or not she knew the payment was an illegal campaign contribution is irrelevant
EffieBlack
Mar 2018
#41
From the bleacher seats it seems Michael Avenatti has David Dennison right where he wants him.
DemocratSinceBirth
Mar 2018
#38