Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hubby is going to have to give up his insurance in a couple of months. He just found out [View all]Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)64. It should be.
But it really isn't the business of the insurance company to know if you pay a share of the premium. That is the company's policy. And so the insurance company can only send the rebate to the company. I am sure that many companies will reimburse the employee for any rebate they receive. I am equally sure that all companies won't. Mine would not....I am positive. Well, unless they HAD to do it or go to jail. But who will know???? I am just saying that it is a possibility.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hubby is going to have to give up his insurance in a couple of months. He just found out [View all]
Justice wanted
Aug 2012
OP
Thank you I don't want to sound like a bitch but it is just hard especially since right now he
Justice wanted
Aug 2012
#2
You can't work? I don't see how anyone makes it these days w/o both spouses working. nt
Honeycombe8
Aug 2012
#51
Right now I'm looking for anything. I have a BA in Travel and tourism! I don't see what that has
Justice wanted
Aug 2012
#84
We live in the Great state of PA where Corbett is screwing over the people left and right just like
Justice wanted
Aug 2012
#6
One's a Repub the other is Casey and if I remember correctly he was against the bill (please
Justice wanted
Aug 2012
#7
Thank you. I should hopefully get the truth from his office and some help. Thank you.
Justice wanted
Aug 2012
#31
That's a long way away from now. And it doesn't explain the $150 to $300 price increase.
Zalatix
Aug 2012
#9
The law is not fully in effect yet. ACA can't enforce premium requirements without the exchanges.
patrice
Aug 2012
#40
And your subject matter expertise on insurance is? There are opinions & then there are opinions.
patrice
Aug 2012
#58
Not all states will have exchanges. Texas won't. Don't know about PA. BUT fed will subsidize...
Honeycombe8
Aug 2012
#49
I am informed that at least some states, such as Kansas, will get the basic exchange structure
patrice
Aug 2012
#71
Thx. It was in our paper this weekend...the fed will do the exchanges here in TX. nt
Honeycombe8
Aug 2012
#93
I hope you're right. But I've read that's not true. It's part of the opt-out part. The state won't
Honeycombe8
Aug 2012
#73
I looked that up. You're right! What a relief. Texas will have exchanges, thank goodness.
Honeycombe8
Aug 2012
#75
The bill says if the states don't set up the exchanges, the fed government does it for them! ala fla
SugarShack
Aug 2012
#90
mind you hubby gets paid every 2 weeks. right now $150 comes out of each pay making it $300 a month
Justice wanted
Aug 2012
#13
It needs the exchanges up and running in order to do that. They're scheduled to be so by 2014.
patrice
Aug 2012
#41
I doesn't sound like a policy increase, it sounds like a who pays increase. n/t
A Simple Game
Aug 2012
#47
If my husband has to give up the insurance will it be harder for him to get the exchange in 2014
Justice wanted
Aug 2012
#10
I know and the two types of medicine he needs is a total of $300.00 a month. We are
Justice wanted
Aug 2012
#16
Get a hold of the drug companies--find out if they have a hardship program. Many do.
MADem
Aug 2012
#26
Not being able to turn someone down is one thing. Making the premiums prohibitive is another...
truth2power
Aug 2012
#37
Because "what constitutes health care" HAS BEEN DEFINED BY A FOR PROFIT SYSTEM, up to this point,
patrice
Aug 2012
#42
No doubt it needs to be redefined. But in this case it's still the insurance company
truth2power
Aug 2012
#44
I read the entire article the other day when it was being used to "prove" what a bad person Obama is
patrice
Aug 2012
#45
Where in that article does the author even mention Pres. Obama? She directs all of her anger
truth2power
Aug 2012
#60
All good points, but missed by those who are more busy "proving" their own predictions about how
patrice
Aug 2012
#70
I'm sorry.. I don't understand what you're saying in that second paragraph...
truth2power
Aug 2012
#79
It looks as though there is assistance for those who are un-insured because of pre-existing
patrice
Aug 2012
#27
We know what it will be a month $300 dollars and We already are having a tight budget
Justice wanted
Aug 2012
#19
Which I would not be surprised is happening. This should be investigated BECAUSE every job
Justice wanted
Aug 2012
#25
I don't know but they way I've heard people talking a lot of insurance companies are going to have
Justice wanted
Aug 2012
#66
Thanks for the info but unfortunately the fact remains that my hubby is screwed (and not the way he
Justice wanted
Aug 2012
#67
it should be by percentage then, if the company pays half they get half the rebate you the other
loli phabay
Aug 2012
#50
My friends living in europe and canada will not come back here if they were forced too.
Justice wanted
Aug 2012
#22
I think it depends on your situation, if you have good coverage and can afford it then the system
loli phabay
Aug 2012
#52
never said anyhting different, personally my circumstances at the moment i prefer the system here
loli phabay
Aug 2012
#54
"...and can afford it..." What it comes down to is MONEY. And it shouldn't be that way...
truth2power
Aug 2012
#61
totally disagree, if someone wants to pay over the odds for elective surgery then they should be
loli phabay
Aug 2012
#62
I'm not talking about people for whom money is no object. They're fortunate enough to have a choice
truth2power
Aug 2012
#78
i dont disagree with that just that i dont think you can shut of private medicine as well
loli phabay
Aug 2012
#82
His employer is a corporation that is based out of New York they took over his hotel and they
Justice wanted
Aug 2012
#36
I'd love to see some substantiation that employers are lowering premiums.
riderinthestorm
Aug 2012
#81
I'm the owner/operator of a small biz and my rates are going up 8% this year
riderinthestorm
Aug 2012
#87
Okay, the ACA provisions you need aren't in effect until 2014, but I'd still find out more about
patrice
Aug 2012
#35
We all lost our insurance benefits at our little non-profit today. Gone. 27 staff, top down.
Zorra
Aug 2012
#88
If it makes you feel any better, I believe this may be another way to get single payer
riderinthestorm
Aug 2012
#91