General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Simple visual that clarifies why the Assault Weapons Ban renewal [View all]Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)[img][/img]
[img][/img]
[img][/img]
[img][/img]
[img][/img]
If you guessed every single one is legal in CA, you would be correct!
The first 2 do not have a detachable magazine, so they are legal (although a screwdriver and 5 minutes would remove that feature.
The 3rd one is a .22 (but it could be converted to .223 in 30 seconds.
The 4th and 5th ones have funny looking grips to get around the pistol grip requirements, but are functionally the same as any AR-15. They are cosimetically different, which doesn't make them any different.
Also, the part of an AR-15 that is considered a rifle is called a lower receiver:
One of the following is banned, one is not: Can you tell which one:
[img][/img]
[img][/img]
If you think they look the exact same, you would be correct. In fact, they may have been made by the same manufacturer, but one is illegal, and one is not.
I feel safer already.
Edit history
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)