Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Simple visual that clarifies why the Assault Weapons Ban renewal [View all]sarisataka
(18,942 posts)139. I did spend some time
Last edited Tue Aug 7, 2012, 05:30 PM - Edit history (1)
as 1 of uncle sams misguided children
I think you did not understand my point. or I was too tired and not saying it right.
I don't agree that the wounded are unimportant, but to the media and others they are soon forgotten.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
243 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Militia definition - 5. A word determined by the Supreme Court in the Heller case to not limit an
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2012
#100
"Pro-controllers.....can never wait to bathe in the blood of the victims to push their agenda."
Tommy_Carcetti
Aug 2012
#143
I disagree. Most of those posts were put into GD by people who rarely, if ever,
shadowrider
Aug 2012
#234
Are they shooting silhouette targets that represent people, or something like these guys?
Hoyt
Aug 2012
#8
IPSC and USPSA use "scored" silhouettes. A, B, & C scoring zones.
OneTenthofOnePercent
Aug 2012
#150
Well, I'll tell you the same thing I tell other people who make this argument...
Scootaloo
Aug 2012
#181
You know, the "target practice" argument reminds me of something when I was a kid
Scootaloo
Aug 2012
#209
Pop quiz, which of these guns in CA legal (where there is an assult weapon ban)
Travis_0004
Aug 2012
#16
Okay, I'm stumped - what's the legal difference between the two lowers? (nt)
Posteritatis
Aug 2012
#21
I thought one of them might have been missing some critical notch or something
krispos42
Aug 2012
#192
Did you post that with a quill pen or a hand-cranked printing press?
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2012
#81
Are all you lot this stump-ignorant? Per the Commonwealth of Massachusetts:
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2012
#191
I *could*, if I didn't mind breaking the law. I do, so no Green Mountain arms sales for me.
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2012
#201
Admit that the only way to end debate about AWs is to ban all semi-auto long guns
krispos42
Aug 2012
#47
Unless they are precluded from military service by Federal law, yes. But so are YOU.
Edweird
Aug 2012
#71
Which he bought legally, despite being dishonorably discharged from the military and having well
Erose999
Aug 2012
#135
1) It wasn't a DD, and 2) Do you *really* want to go the 'watch list' route?
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2012
#137
One recent photo that proves the dishonesty (or ignorance) of the cartoon in the OP
slackmaster
Aug 2012
#14
Yes but not nearly as noble as letting home invaders have their way with your wife and children
spayneuter
Aug 2012
#175
Can you point me to the bit in the ill of Rights that says it's okay to walk into cinemas
sibelian
Aug 2012
#166
There Is No Shame In Ignorance, Because The Ignorant Are Too Stupid To Be Ashamed...
WillyT
Aug 2012
#31
It Is Both Ignorant And Stupid To Own An Assault Rifle... There Is Absolutely NO Reason...
WillyT
Aug 2012
#39
LOL !!! - He Wasn't Drunk At The Outset, But He Was Having Difficulty With His Gal...
WillyT
Aug 2012
#59
Mira here is a short video, that explains EXACTLY what the AW ban actully did..
virginia mountainman
Aug 2012
#24
You Forgot To Mentioned The Injured... Or... "Shot, But Not Dead"... They Don't Count ???
WillyT
Aug 2012
#61
Classy. Another example of *why* gun control is the success that it is...
friendly_iconoclast
Aug 2012
#86
If you substitute "NAACP" for "NRA" your comment will closely resemble many I see posted on
spayneuter
Aug 2012
#222
GWB. *. Was. Is. and forever will be the asshole of assholes. Now with that out of the way
Mira
Aug 2012
#65
"President Bush says he will sign a bill renewing the assault weapons ban if Congress passes it."
hack89
Aug 2012
#125
Here's (1) a simple visual to clarify a problem and (2) a Bill Clinton analysis
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2012
#88
Explain the difference between hunting with a ar platform with a 5 round mag and a 100 yr old mosin
rad51
Aug 2012
#103
Are you 120 years old? Semi-auto guns have been used for hunting for a century
NickB79
Aug 2012
#126
I don't believe for an instant your "era" was all about single-shot firearms. (nt)
Posteritatis
Aug 2012
#155
And the AR round has less recoil and is lighter and more compact and less expensive. Intermediate
Erose999
Aug 2012
#144
Hands, feet, knives, and baseball bats are all multi-purpose tools. An Assault Rifle is a unitasker.
Erose999
Aug 2012
#157
"some sort of firearm" isn't what this thread is about- "assault weapons" is the subject at hand.
X_Digger
Aug 2012
#230
If that's how you want to limit the conversation, then there's a question begging to be asked.
Tommy_Carcetti
Aug 2012
#232
Well, obviously an AR-15 *could* be used for sport or hunting purposes. It is a gun, after all.
Tommy_Carcetti
Aug 2012
#237
No! NRA propaganda! Impossible! The only reason prohibition doesn't work is that
Egalitarian Thug
Aug 2012
#105
Simple visual that clarifies why the Assault Weapons Ban renewal is a no-brainer.
Egalitarian Thug
Aug 2012
#106
Funny, you can buy an AR-15, AK-47 and other semi-auto "assault" guns in Canada.
rDigital
Aug 2012
#149