Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

RandomAccess

(5,210 posts)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 10:51 AM Jul 2018

BOMBSHELL - ATTN Naysayers who think elections can't be stolen via machines - [View all]

Courtesy: Threadreader https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1019221300798152704.html

In April, voting machine vendor ES&S (44% US election equipment) admitted in a letter to Sen. Wyden that it “installed REMOTE-ACCESS SOFTWARE on election-management systems it sold over a period of 6 years”! ES&S previously lied about this to the NYT!

Top Voting Machine Vendor Admits It Installed Remote-Access Software on Systems Sold to States
Remote-access software and modems on election equipment 'is the worst decision for security short of leaving ballot boxes on a Moscow street corner.'
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/mb4ezy/top-voting-machine-vendor-admits-it-installed-remote-access-software-on-systems-sold-to-states
1/

2/ “It’s not clear why ES&S would have only installed the software on the systems of “a small number of customers” and not all customers, unless other customers objected or had state laws preventing this”

3/ Election management systems “sit in county election offices and contain software that in some counties is used to program all the voting machines used in the county; the systems also tabulate final results aggregated from voting machines.”

4/ “ES&S customers who had pcAnywhere installed also had MODEMS on their election-management systems so ES&S technicians could dial into the systems and use the software to troubleshoot, thereby creating a potential port of entry for hackers as well.”

5/ “Motherboard asked a Michigan spokesman if any officials in his state ever installed the pcAnywhere software that ES&S recommended they install, but got no response.”

6/ “If an attacker can gain remote access to an election-management system through the modem and take control of it using the pcAnywhere software installed on it, he can introduce malicious code that gets passed to voting machines to disrupt an election or alter results.”

7/ “Wyden told Motherboard that installing remote-access software and modems on election equipment “is the worst decision for security short of leaving ballot boxes on a Moscow street corner.”

8/
“In 2006, the same period when ES&S says it was still installing pcAnywhere on election systems, hackers stole the source code for the pcAnyhere software, though the public didn’t learn of this until years later in 2012 when a hacker posted some of the source code online.”

9/ ES&S defended its installation of pcAnywhere, saying that “other voting system manufacturers” did it too!!!

10/ Motherboard asked two of the other top voting machine vendors—Hart InterCivic and Dominion—if they (like ES&S) had installed remote access software onto election management systems, but “neither responded”!!!

11/ IT Professor & election equipment expert Doug Jones says that “Certainly, [Diebold Election Systems] did the same, as “many of their contracts with customers included the requirement of a remote-login port allowing [the company] to have remote access...” #gapol @markniesse

12/ “Although Wyden's office asked ES&S to identify which of its customers were sold systems with [remote access software] installed, the company did not respond”!!

13/ “All of this raises questions about how many counties across the US had remote-access software installed ... and whether intruders had ever leveraged it to subvert elections.”

14/ Thank you to @r_mccormick for bringing this jaw dropping article to my attention and to @kimzetter for writing it!
RELATED THREADS
15/


?s=21
16/ Related Thread

?s=21
17/ Related:

?s=21

ORIGINAL TWEET THREAD:
71 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Russian was accessing voter rolls at state and local levels NewJeffCT Jul 2018 #1
True. But also remember -- there have been election "problems" with the machines RandomAccess Jul 2018 #2
Exactly. And from the OP it's apparent that individual voting machines... brush Jul 2018 #5
Eye opening! triron Jul 2018 #3
I definitely believe it. RandomAccess Jul 2018 #6
When that happened I felt doom in my gut pandr32 Jul 2018 #33
Wow. FM123 Jul 2018 #4
Twelve years sagesnow Jul 2018 #7
Having remote access software is not bad unless its left running 24/7 Perseus Jul 2018 #30
remote access is a mistake...unless youjust want the best hacker to decide election results questionseverything Jul 2018 #37
K + R Raastan Jul 2018 #8
K&R Scurrilous Jul 2018 #9
We've had folks here pushing the MYTHOLOGY that this isn't possible. lagomorph777 Jul 2018 #10
And that exit polls are useless for determining election fraud. triron Jul 2018 #32
The exit polls in the U.S. aren't designed to detect fraud mythology Jul 2018 #41
I guarantee you. We will STILL hear kcr Jul 2018 #11
From the article in Daily Beast Progressive dog Jul 2018 #12
It's about the machines used to program the voting terminals kcr Jul 2018 #13
I read the article Progressive dog Jul 2018 #17
we have allowed the venders to control our elections questionseverything Jul 2018 #48
The Russians and Hillary haters gave us Trump Progressive dog Jul 2018 #56
since e s&s has admitted to wyden there is a backdoor questionseverything Jul 2018 #61
election integrity activists count 6 wis wards questionseverything Jul 2018 #62
"Election integrity activists" Progressive dog Jul 2018 #63
Is there a possibility that a hacker could change voter rolls via remote software? blogslut Jul 2018 #40
The tabulation of votes is not the same as voter rolls. Progressive dog Jul 2018 #54
You may be right. The problem is -- RandomAccess Jul 2018 #58
We could cut down on the number of voters Progressive dog Jul 2018 #59
Cut down on the number of voters? RandomAccess Jul 2018 #60
"You've been studying it since 2003" Progressive dog Jul 2018 #64
First, I should thank you RandomAccess Jul 2018 #65
The claim I made is a well documented fact Progressive dog Jul 2018 #66
And NOT calling obviously anomalous and suspicious results RandomAccess Jul 2018 #67
I am suspicious of those helping to undermine faith in democracy Progressive dog Jul 2018 #68
Yes - RandomAccess Jul 2018 #57
This is the "you can't handle the truth" part that will perhaps be included in the ElementaryPenguin Jul 2018 #14
It makes me crazy: RandomAccess Jul 2018 #15
Me too. ElementaryPenguin Jul 2018 #16
Me three! JoeOtterbein Jul 2018 #21
I've contemplated it plenty. BadgerMom Jul 2018 #25
I knew this in my gut that fateful Tuesday evening. I have been sick about it ever airmid Jul 2018 #39
"As far as we know, some guy from Russia could be controlling the outcome of computerized elections" MrsCoffee Jul 2018 #18
Thanks RandomAccess Jul 2018 #43
I've always had a bad feeling about our machines, ESPECIALLY seeing with the REPUGS of today!!! bluestarone Jul 2018 #70
Paper Ballots indeed RandomAccess Jul 2018 #71
Enabling conspiracy. moondust Jul 2018 #19
There's certainly no doubt THEY WOULD ElementaryPenguin Jul 2018 #22
Diebold was fined $50 million for doing just that. Lonestarblue Jul 2018 #31
I remember that well. Meadowoak Jul 2018 #35
K&R ck4829 Jul 2018 #20
I swear these voting machine companies did there absolute best gtar100 Jul 2018 #23
Uhhh, not quite RandomAccess Jul 2018 #44
No, I think it was quite intentional. gtar100 Jul 2018 #49
Oh, then we're in agreement RandomAccess Jul 2018 #50
Paper ballots. Counted by a representative of each party by hand. Rep of each party fierywoman Jul 2018 #24
It's a basic national security issue. byronius Jul 2018 #26
Yup: Citizens United has to be destroyed. fierywoman Jul 2018 #29
YES, YES, YES -- And here's what to do about it RandomAccess Jul 2018 #47
Ok, this is not going to be popular, but... Perseus Jul 2018 #27
Perhaps the DNC has always had too many NoMoreRepugs Jul 2018 #34
Yep. Meadowoak Jul 2018 #36
I have never understood why the Democrats haven't been more RandomAccess Jul 2018 #46
AKA....The FIX is in! workinclasszero Jul 2018 #28
And I got some shit on my thread edhopper Jul 2018 #38
Don't Need Remote Access to Alter the Votes Raymond Costello Jul 2018 #42
AND there'll never BE any "reverse engineering" because the RandomAccess Jul 2018 #45
Thank you for posting Time for change Jul 2018 #51
Excellent comments - thanks RandomAccess Jul 2018 #52
I wholeheartedly agree! nightwing1240 Jul 2018 #53
Motherboard? More like Motherfucker Board Blue Owl Jul 2018 #55
It's only simple logic, no physical evidence when they steal it, unless you have exit polls nolabels Jul 2018 #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BOMBSHELL - ATTN Naysayer...