General Discussion

Raymond Costello

(1 post)

42. Don't Need Remote Access to Alter the Votes

Tue Jul 17, 2018, 01:15 PM

Jul 2018

I'm an I.T. professional. You don't need remote access to the voting machines and you don't want access to them. The most efficient way to alter the votes on hundreds of machines is to get in and hack the program at the developers desk BEFORE the program is loaded into the voting machines. For every six Hillary votes, give four of hers to Trump. That's how you do it. It works especially well when there is no paper audit to verify against the electronic numbers. The only way to prove the machine was hacked is to reverse engineer the program on one of the voting machines that still has the hacked code to see how it works.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

71 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

BOMBSHELL - ATTN Naysayers who think elections can't be stolen via machines - [View all] RandomAccess Jul 2018 OP

If Russian was accessing voter rolls at state and local levels NewJeffCT Jul 2018 #1

True. But also remember -- there have been election "problems" with the machines RandomAccess Jul 2018 #2

Exactly. And from the OP it's apparent that individual voting machines... brush Jul 2018 #5

Eye opening! triron Jul 2018 #3

I definitely believe it. RandomAccess Jul 2018 #6

When that happened I felt doom in my gut pandr32 Jul 2018 #33

Wow. FM123 Jul 2018 #4

Twelve years sagesnow Jul 2018 #7

Having remote access software is not bad unless its left running 24/7 Perseus Jul 2018 #30

remote access is a mistake...unless youjust want the best hacker to decide election results questionseverything Jul 2018 #37

K + R Raastan Jul 2018 #8

K&R Scurrilous Jul 2018 #9

We've had folks here pushing the MYTHOLOGY that this isn't possible. lagomorph777 Jul 2018 #10

And that exit polls are useless for determining election fraud. triron Jul 2018 #32

The exit polls in the U.S. aren't designed to detect fraud mythology Jul 2018 #41

I guarantee you. We will STILL hear kcr Jul 2018 #11

From the article in Daily Beast Progressive dog Jul 2018 #12

It's about the machines used to program the voting terminals kcr Jul 2018 #13

I read the article Progressive dog Jul 2018 #17

we have allowed the venders to control our elections questionseverything Jul 2018 #48

The Russians and Hillary haters gave us Trump Progressive dog Jul 2018 #56

since e s&s has admitted to wyden there is a backdoor questionseverything Jul 2018 #61

election integrity activists count 6 wis wards questionseverything Jul 2018 #62

"Election integrity activists" Progressive dog Jul 2018 #63

Is there a possibility that a hacker could change voter rolls via remote software? blogslut Jul 2018 #40

The tabulation of votes is not the same as voter rolls. Progressive dog Jul 2018 #54

You may be right. The problem is -- RandomAccess Jul 2018 #58

We could cut down on the number of voters Progressive dog Jul 2018 #59

Cut down on the number of voters? RandomAccess Jul 2018 #60

"You've been studying it since 2003" Progressive dog Jul 2018 #64

First, I should thank you RandomAccess Jul 2018 #65

The claim I made is a well documented fact Progressive dog Jul 2018 #66

And NOT calling obviously anomalous and suspicious results RandomAccess Jul 2018 #67

I am suspicious of those helping to undermine faith in democracy Progressive dog Jul 2018 #68

Yes - RandomAccess Jul 2018 #57

This is the "you can't handle the truth" part that will perhaps be included in the ElementaryPenguin Jul 2018 #14

It makes me crazy: RandomAccess Jul 2018 #15

Me too. ElementaryPenguin Jul 2018 #16

Me three! JoeOtterbein Jul 2018 #21

I've contemplated it plenty. BadgerMom Jul 2018 #25

I knew this in my gut that fateful Tuesday evening. I have been sick about it ever airmid Jul 2018 #39

"As far as we know, some guy from Russia could be controlling the outcome of computerized elections" MrsCoffee Jul 2018 #18

Thanks RandomAccess Jul 2018 #43

I've always had a bad feeling about our machines, ESPECIALLY seeing with the REPUGS of today!!! bluestarone Jul 2018 #70

Paper Ballots indeed RandomAccess Jul 2018 #71

Enabling conspiracy. moondust Jul 2018 #19

There's certainly no doubt THEY WOULD ElementaryPenguin Jul 2018 #22

Diebold was fined $50 million for doing just that. Lonestarblue Jul 2018 #31

I remember that well. Meadowoak Jul 2018 #35

K&R ck4829 Jul 2018 #20

I swear these voting machine companies did there absolute best gtar100 Jul 2018 #23

Uhhh, not quite RandomAccess Jul 2018 #44

No, I think it was quite intentional. gtar100 Jul 2018 #49

Oh, then we're in agreement RandomAccess Jul 2018 #50

Paper ballots. Counted by a representative of each party by hand. Rep of each party fierywoman Jul 2018 #24

It's a basic national security issue. byronius Jul 2018 #26

Yup: Citizens United has to be destroyed. fierywoman Jul 2018 #29

YES, YES, YES -- And here's what to do about it RandomAccess Jul 2018 #47

Ok, this is not going to be popular, but... Perseus Jul 2018 #27

Perhaps the DNC has always had too many NoMoreRepugs Jul 2018 #34

Yep. Meadowoak Jul 2018 #36

I have never understood why the Democrats haven't been more RandomAccess Jul 2018 #46

AKA....The FIX is in! workinclasszero Jul 2018 #28

And I got some shit on my thread edhopper Jul 2018 #38

Don't Need Remote Access to Alter the Votes Raymond Costello Jul 2018 #42

AND there'll never BE any "reverse engineering" because the RandomAccess Jul 2018 #45

Thank you for posting Time for change Jul 2018 #51

Excellent comments - thanks RandomAccess Jul 2018 #52

I wholeheartedly agree! nightwing1240 Jul 2018 #53

Motherboard? More like Motherfucker Board Blue Owl Jul 2018 #55

It's only simple logic, no physical evidence when they steal it, unless you have exit polls nolabels Jul 2018 #69