Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: No Choice: Why Harry Truman Dropped the Atomic Bomb on Japan [View all]MicaelS
(8,747 posts)4. Japan was negotiating surrender..
On their terms, which were unacceptable to the Allies.
Even if there was just a Naval Blockade, millions of Japanese would have started to death. So lots of Japanese would have died no matter what.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
138 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Here's a longer article that also talks about the secret talks with Stalin...
TreasonousBastard
Aug 2018
#1
Over a million Japanese troops under arms in China at the time of the surrender, perfectly capable..
Marengo
Aug 2018
#31
Germany wasn't considered as a primary target as its defeat was expected to occur before before
Marengo
Aug 2018
#63
If Japan blockaded Vladivostok and destroyed some of the bridges and tunnels of the...
TreasonousBastard
Aug 2018
#13
Our atomic bombs killed 40,000 to 50,000 innocent Koreans who were held in Japan as slaves.
Goodheart
Aug 2018
#27
The Japanese or Germans would have used atomic weapons if they had them before us.
BSdetect
Aug 2018
#38
Uh, in regards to Germany being "years away", you are wrong. Heavy water was already being produced.
tonyt53
Aug 2018
#127
It was a weapon we developed to fight WWII, no one else had one until long after WWII was in the
braddy
Aug 2018
#39
Fact is, we are the only country to have killed thousands of innocent people with a "special" bomb.
Hoyt
Aug 2018
#34
My dad was ONE of them. In the first US landing in the Pacific, and war effort ended at Iwo Jima.
tonyt53
Aug 2018
#129
Why do you believe the "bomb em" folks. I don't see how annihilating two important Japanese
Hoyt
Aug 2018
#67
War was over, we are only country to nuke anyone, we are racist, we bully the world now and
Hoyt
Aug 2018
#114
And you aren't willing to accept another narrative either. No, I got the point on Civil War and I
Hoyt
Aug 2018
#118
Not just us, I bet the Chinese, Brits, Filipinos, Aussies, New Zealand, Koreans, etc., etc., etc.,
braddy
Aug 2018
#43
Some folks might have taken to streets, probably same ones who'd vote for trump or bush.
Hoyt
Aug 2018
#55
"Use it" especially against Asians. We could have demonstrated it on a deserted island.
Hoyt
Aug 2018
#76
If Asian casualties are a marker, what about Imperial Japan's "Rape of Nanking," in 1937?
VOX
Aug 2018
#98
So are you saying we nuked innocent Japanese 8 years after Rape of Nanking as justified retribution?
Hoyt
Aug 2018
#99
No, I'm not saying that at all. The thread was implying that nukes were okay'd, because...Asians.
VOX
Aug 2018
#116
The Japanese were slaughtering innocent Chinese, Filipinos, Indonesians, etc until the very end.
hack89
Aug 2018
#120
They were defeated and surrounded, do a little reading including Eisenhower's view.
Hoyt
Aug 2018
#130
We appear stuck on this issue, just like your support of guns. The two are similar in many ways.
Hoyt
Aug 2018
#137
They surrendered after the Soviets declared war on Japan. Correlation or causation?
malchickiwick
Aug 2018
#45
Actually, they had offered terms of surrender before Hiroshima (via the Swiss).
malchickiwick
Aug 2018
#60
Japan chose not to end the war and vowed to fight to the death before the first
beachbum bob
Aug 2018
#52
It must be the first week in August: DU gets to refight the war none of us remembers personally
Hekate
Aug 2018
#97
I had long discussions with my parents, especially my Mom on this before they passed...
hlthe2b
Aug 2018
#107