Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)

6. Really? Just me ..I know...but she did not

Reply to EffieBlack (Original post)

Wed Sep 5, 2018, 11:51 PM

Sep 2018

come off as 100% "speak from the core of your being" liberal to me. I want to get on her bandwagon, I do. Maybe just me but some in hearings sounded like their first agenda was how they looked/sounded based on future ambitions vs. an inate passion. For those of us who have it...it is so easy to identify.
Maybe it's just her cadence? Seems off to me?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I am SO glad Kamala Harris didn't boycott the Kavanaugh hearings [View all] EffieBlack Sep 2018 OP

She's a former prosecutor Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 2018 #1

She is impressive mcar Sep 2018 #2

That tweet. sheshe2 Sep 2018 #3

LOL, that is a great question. She is formidable! nt R B Garr Sep 2018 #4

What language is Kavanaugh speaking? BigmanPigman Sep 2018 #5

Really? Just me ..I know...but she did not Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2018 #6

It's the cadence of a lawyer / San Francisco AG/ California AG. She has the passion. nt iluvtennis Sep 2018 #10

This isn't the time or place for "passion" EffieBlack Sep 2018 #12

Yes, I agree with that....I was thinking more Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2018 #17

I'll worry about her "passion" if and when she becomes a candidate EffieBlack Sep 2018 #19

Ok Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2018 #24

I don't think any of the Democratic Senators are worried about their future ambitions. George II Sep 2018 #14

Really? Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2018 #18

In the context of this hearing and their actions, yes really. George II Sep 2018 #20

No, not naive. It's subtle. But, did make me feel Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2018 #25

Wasn't the big issue with Bork his views on privacy? That there was no right to privacy? bobbieinok Sep 2018 #7

That was one of them. He claimed to be a "Strict Constitutionalist" haele Sep 2018 #23

He carried out Nixon's orders after N fired those who wouldn't (Sat Nite Massacre) bobbieinok Sep 2018 #27

k&r Demovictory9 Sep 2018 #8

K & R. Ace pro. appalachiablue Sep 2018 #9

"Can you think of any laws that give govt. power to make decisions about the male body?" appalachiablue Sep 2018 #11

The thought of boycotting the hearing was pointless. It would have accomplished.... George II Sep 2018 #13

I don't know when these laws were overturned dsc Sep 2018 #15

She is soooo running in 2020! Nanjeanne Sep 2018 #16

She's a tough one. No nonsense. oasis Sep 2018 #21

You and me both, Effie Hekate Sep 2018 #22

Did we ever find out who she was talking about at Trump's law firm? FBaggins Sep 2018 #26

It doesn't matter EffieBlack Sep 2018 #28