Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The credibility of a gathering is damaged when that gathering invites speakers to that event who [View all]JCanete
(5,272 posts)25. and he really showed everybody by saying that....all those specifics. Usually burns land better
if you show something specific that you are challenging or something ironic about the person's statement...etc. What did he reveal here? What did he prove?
The point isn't by the way, that he shouldn't have tweeted. He felt what he was saying was worth saying. But why do you think it sheds light on anything or adds anything?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
100 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The credibility of a gathering is damaged when that gathering invites speakers to that event who [View all]
still_one
Dec 2018
OP
Hmmmm, all I know is that some participants in such a gathering actively worked to suppress
still_one
Dec 2018
#4
you think stating the facts is bashing? Gee, "us guys" better be more creative
still_one
Dec 2018
#6
Based on the criteria setup in the OP, it is logical and factual. "The credibility of a gathering
still_one
Dec 2018
#31
Had the OP actually identified a specific event, I would have responded differently
Ms. Toad
Dec 2018
#73
I honestly didn't know the reference. Until other OPs went up about the lack of diversity
salin
Dec 2018
#20
I am NOT bashing Democrats, including Senator Sanders, but questioning the credibility of a group
still_one
Dec 2018
#35
So what? What did he say that was particularly insightful in that tweet you thought so important?
JCanete
Dec 2018
#23
and he really showed everybody by saying that....all those specifics. Usually burns land better
JCanete
Dec 2018
#25
what? give me a break. People have a range of opinions. And there are more valid ones than ours.
JCanete
Dec 2018
#22
Someone pls give me a stronger hint or link or something? I want to know who was there.
brush
Dec 2018
#46
"..it's crystal clear it was programmed with the idea Democrats would blow the midterms."
Cha
Dec 2018
#40
The AP described a it as a "pep rally" rather than as an event to be taken seriously. N/T
lapucelle
Dec 2018
#51
Well shit...someobdy at the AP has spoken...why should anybody take that opinion seriously? nt
JCanete
Dec 2018
#86
still true...but there's details and then there's just you repeating the circle jerk stuff.
JCanete
Dec 2018
#88
That's an embarassing comeback. Do you want to explain to me just how upstanding the news
JCanete
Dec 2018
#90
I don't know....you are the one that broke up that sentance. "how upstanding the news was" is what
JCanete
Dec 2018
#92
I take that as you'd rather just stick to the snarks rather than any content. nt
JCanete
Dec 2018
#95
Both ABC News and US News and World Report carried the "pep rally" story. N/T
lapucelle
Dec 2018
#97