Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
36. She's in compliance only because the law is enforced so poorly.
Sat Dec 29, 2018, 05:47 AM
Dec 2018

According to the July 2018 article, she hadn't filed required reports since sometime in 2017.

She was never serious about the recount. But she did succeed in getting enough votes in three key states to flip the election to Trump.

In June, The Daily Beast reported that the the U.S. Green Party candidate’s campaign, which raised $7.3 million for recounts in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, had in 2017 stopped disclosing its monthly spending with the Federal Election Commission. Later that month, the Jill Stein for President committee filed a slew of reports that reveal spending on lawyers who are not trying to get inside any voting machines.


And there is more here:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/what-happened-to-jill-steins-recount-millions

“It is strange that they would just stop filing reports given they were a legitimate, professional campaign, and despite still having more than a million dollars in cash on hand,” Andrew Mayersohn, a researcher at the Center for Responsive Politics, told The Daily Beast.

Jonathan S. Abady, an attorney with Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP, the New York-based firm that represents Stein and her campaign, told The Daily Beast that legal efforts on the recount persist to this day.

But the opacity surrounding the expenditure of money—combined with the fact that a good chunk of the spending has come after all efforts to recount the vote were terminated—has fed criticism that Stein was more interested in boosting her political operations than in recounting votes. It’s also drawn the ire of regulators. In a May 7, 2018 letter, the FEC warned Stein campaign treasurer Steven Welzer that he was violating federal law by not accounting for half a year of spending.

“The failure to timely file this report may result in civil money penalties, suspension of matching funds, an audit or legal enforcement action,” the letter states, noting there is no grace period.

SNIP

Much of the spending has taken place long since any hope for more recounts came to an end. Of the more than $509,000 spent on staff, more than $300,000 has been spent since February 20, 2017, according to the Stein campaign. The same is true for 87 percent of travel and events spending.

As the Center for Responsive Politics has noted, U.S. law dictates that funds raised for a recount “only go toward expenses directly related to the recount, such as paying state staff that counts the votes or any other administrative or overhead payments, as well as post-election litigation.”
She's a con artist. madaboutharry Dec 2018 #1
I came close to donating for the recount Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2018 #3
I'm glad you refrained.. Cha Dec 2018 #10
her attacks on Hillary stopped me Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2018 #19
"...you can't send someone dirty to uncover dirty deeds." Cha Dec 2018 #23
Right out of the Donald Trump playbook. SergeStorms Dec 2018 #28
Sounds like some Cha Dec 2018 #29
Florence, CO GWC58 Dec 2018 #57
I was a bit tempted at first, susanna Dec 2018 #30
I also came close to donating Stargazer09 Dec 2018 #33
One of several that I have great contempt for. NurseJackie Dec 2018 #13
I guess I won't be seeing a refund of my $30. BigmanPigman Dec 2018 #2
I can empathize Hermit-The-Prog Dec 2018 #20
People should demand refunds. LiberalFighter Dec 2018 #4
Ah ha,, Wellstone ruled Dec 2018 #5
I read the article. GulfCoast66 Dec 2018 #6
Still amazed that so many gullible fools handed over $$ to her MichMan Dec 2018 #7
Question: How is this not illegal? ProudLib72 Dec 2018 #8
"Hillary is more dangerous than Donald Trump" - Jill Stein Maru Kitteh Dec 2018 #9
Trump is the antithesis of Green elias7 Dec 2018 #37
The Green party keeps crowning her their nominee. Maru Kitteh Dec 2018 #38
The Green Party is a fraud, and it speaks volumes about folks like Susan Sarandon and Cornel West still_one Dec 2018 #39
You asked the question that always is there. Blue_true Dec 2018 #52
Obviousscam was obvious. Codeine Dec 2018 #11
I'm amazed people sent her money. Solly Mack Dec 2018 #12
I know. As soon as she raised the requested amount, it should have been obvious pnwmom Dec 2018 #14
She did. And she's defiant about it too. Solly Mack Dec 2018 #15
Stein is beeaking the law Gothmog Dec 2018 #16
You know, I used to be a Green Party supporter, voting for Dems AllyCat Dec 2018 #17
Now you have OAC WhiteHat Dec 2018 #25
Of course it is.. that's why we Vote Cha Dec 2018 #31
AOC isn't a Jill Stein or Green Party supporter. n/t pnwmom Dec 2018 #41
Exactly why are you yelling at me? AllyCat Dec 2018 #47
Why can't she be charged &/or sued for fraud? ANYONE else I've ever heard of who pulled The_REAL_Ecumenist Dec 2018 #18
I'm really not worried about $5 videohead5 Dec 2018 #21
Post removed Post removed Dec 2018 #26
OMFG. You mean Jill Stein was an unwitting agent of a foreign power? WhiteHat Dec 2018 #22
Unwitting? MrsCoffee Dec 2018 #44
Here is a history of how the recount came about. diva77 Dec 2018 #24
That clip leaves a great deal out that shows what a scam this was. pnwmom Dec 2018 #27
The scam is that the RETHUGS rigged the election and did everything to obstruct recounts diva77 Dec 2018 #34
She's in compliance only because the law is enforced so poorly. pnwmom Dec 2018 #36
Stein directly contributed to Trump being elected. yardwork Dec 2018 #42
You are wrong -- Stein was and is a scam artist obamanut2012 Dec 2018 #45
Geee, I can't imagine why... MrsCoffee Dec 2018 #46
Stein helped the Russians in my opinion...she is a traitor and I despise her...hope she Demsrule86 Dec 2018 #55
Here's a short history of what Jill Stein did with the money.. Cha Dec 2018 #32
People forget the Clinton campaign supported the recount effort. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2018 #43
And people forget that Bernie was fine with that. MrsCoffee Dec 2018 #48
and it's too bad that Clinton conceded. There is evidence of rampant election fraud diva77 Dec 2018 #49
She couldn't have changed the results and she knew it. Michigan had a Rethug governor pnwmom Dec 2018 #63
I hope she's indicted by Mueller. roamer65 Dec 2018 #35
I had a couple of friends who were die hard Stein blur256 Dec 2018 #40
This message was self-deleted by its author elocs Dec 2018 #50
And if she ran again she would get millions of votes. The reason why is why we may not survive Eliot Rosewater Dec 2018 #51
She initiated recounts RockCreek Dec 2018 #53
There was never going to be any proof...as for initiating recounts. She scammed people and took Demsrule86 Dec 2018 #56
No, that isn't the real question, or any question. Hillary understood the recount process pnwmom Dec 2018 #59
Of course, she did. Stein is a Scammer.. Cha Dec 2018 #60
As big a scumbag as Dump thegoose Dec 2018 #54
That recount fundraising gave Stein and The Green Party the names and info of Democratic donors CreekDog Dec 2018 #58
It sickens me to see that. ffr Dec 2018 #61
The sooner Jill Stein and the Green Party go away the better! Initech Dec 2018 #62
... Scurrilous Dec 2018 #64
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Remember the millions Jil...»Reply #36