Did you do a poll of 100% of them? (Reply #29)

In the discussion thread: Post removed [View all]

Sat Jan 12, 2019, 01:40 PM

29. Did you do a poll of 100% of them?

It's an interesting claim.

If it would be wrong to hold it against someone like Clinton that they did switch to the good position, then possibly it would also be wrong of you to hold it against Gabbard, right?

Cannot reply in removed threads

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

66 replies	Author	Time	Post
Post removed [View all]	Post removed	Jan 2019	OP
"Gabbard scrambles ideological assumptions"	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#1
Post removed	Post removed	Jan 2019	#53
She's her own worst enemy and will not be competitive IMO, so no need to debate	hlthe2b	Jan 2019	#2
Respectfully disagree	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#4
THat is probably true as well...	hlthe2b	Jan 2019	#5
I can't say much because I'm sick of hides,	Codeine	Jan 2019	#3
Yeah.	ismnotwasm	Jan 2019	#7
Another look - from Charlie.............	MyOwnPeace	Jan 2019	#6
"more like calculated mischief"	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#17
"Is this a case of Democratic candidate bashing? Hmmmm."	MyOwnPeace	Jan 2019	#45
to quote the kids of today...	qazplm135	Jan 2019	#8
Too late.	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#14
non sequitor	qazplm135	Jan 2019	#16
She never gets pushed around on the news shows. She is too confident.	irresistable	Jan 2019	#19
+1	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#22
+2	Devil Child	Jan 2019	#30
It's not a canard.	backabby-blue	Jan 2019	#9
See post below on common Tulsi-bashing tropes.	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#15
I disagree.	backabby-blue	Jan 2019	#20
No doubt someone will ask her that and we will see what she says then.	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#23
Yes and the very people who support Tulsi	backabby-blue	Jan 2019	#26
Did you do a poll of 100% of them?	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#29
If it were the only reason but it's not.	backabby-blue	Jan 2019	#32
I'm glad we will be testing that out. Thank you.	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#33
Yes.	backabby-blue	Jan 2019	#36
Hillary by the time she ran had the support of the GBLTQ community	ismnotwasm	Jan 2019	#44
UPDATED: Here's why the Hawaii LGBT Caucus doesn't support Rep. Tulsi Gabbard's reelection campaign	Cha	Jan 2019	#62
That is exactly how to frame it in terms red state voters will grasp immediately	NotASurfer	Jan 2019	#10
Yes, it is.	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#13
Well said. It is how to frame it.	Achilleaze	Jan 2019	#37
I appreciate her entering the race.	David__77	Jan 2019	#11
ANSWERS TO THE COMMON TULSI BASHING	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#12
To some of her critics, Hindu is synonymous with "Hindu Nationalist".	irresistable	Jan 2019	#21
Thank you for this informative post!	Devil Child	Jan 2019	#27
...	BannonsLiver	Jan 2019	#18
If that's the level of objection, I like her chances.	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#24
That's just about all the above twaddle is worth	BannonsLiver	Jan 2019	#39
...and being Putin's bitch does not enoble the republicans either	Achilleaze	Jan 2019	#25
The article you cited seems to insinuate there was a legitimate diplomatic purpose...	Tommy_Carcetti	Jan 2019	#28
Wow.	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#31
Trump meeting Kim Jung Un	backabby-blue	Jan 2019	#34
Please don't purport to speak for "We"	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#40
I don't believe NK has good intentions	backabby-blue	Jan 2019	#41
Then you should take your complaint to SK.	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#43
This is gonna be a long primary season, Tommy	obamanut2012	Jan 2019	#35
Tulsi Gabbard: Same-Sex marriage advocated by "homosexual extremists"	brooklynite	Jan 2019	#38
Why does your attack graphic omit the date?	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#42
they both favored civil unions	dsc	Jan 2019	#46
That's how it appeared in Twitter	brooklynite	Jan 2019	#47
Well then why do you reproduce it here?	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#49
I'll place a measure of trust in CNN...	brooklynite	Jan 2019	#52
You are not answering the question.	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#59
No they weren't like other Democrats at the time	dsc	Jan 2019	#66
That was in 2004, when she was a State Legislator.	OilemFirchen	Jan 2019	#54
2004 also means she was 24 years old and in a different family situation she has left.	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#57
Unresponsive.	OilemFirchen	Jan 2019	#63
Irrelevant either way. See 61 or 58.	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#65
that is out and out false	dsc	Jan 2019	#64
False. Tulsi Gabbard on LGBT TODAY.	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#61
God this place is going to suck for two years straight	Codeine	Jan 2019	#48
Thank you for kicking this important thread.	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#50
Oh noes, I've repeated myself.	Codeine	Jan 2019	#51
No, it's quite alright. Please do it again.	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#60
yup	obamanut2012	Jan 2019	#55
I'm keeping an open mind about 2020 candidates	NastyRiffraff	Jan 2019	#56
"Tulsi Gabbard on LGBT"	JackRiddler	Jan 2019	#58

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.