Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)29. Did you do a poll of 100% of them?
It's an interesting claim.
If it would be wrong to hold it against someone like Clinton that they did switch to the good position, then possibly it would also be wrong of you to hold it against Gabbard, right?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
UPDATED: Here's why the Hawaii LGBT Caucus doesn't support Rep. Tulsi Gabbard's reelection campaign
Cha
Jan 2019
#62
That is exactly how to frame it in terms red state voters will grasp immediately
NotASurfer
Jan 2019
#10
The article you cited seems to insinuate there was a legitimate diplomatic purpose...
Tommy_Carcetti
Jan 2019
#28
2004 also means she was 24 years old and in a different family situation she has left.
JackRiddler
Jan 2019
#57