Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Was Mueller pressured to end his investigation? [View all]Jarqui
(10,126 posts)5. That isn't what Barr assured
https://www.apnews.com/719fb6dc299f43339ead6af26626459d
So there wasn't a specific proposed action.
Barr had already taken the position that Mueller's efforts on obstruction were misguided
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=11952157
so that part of the investigation was effectively dead when Barr got nominated. He is the Special Counsel's unrecused boss.
Maybe something like this happened:
Barr: "Have you got unreasonable doubt on Russian collusion yet?"
Mueller: "Not yet. We're working on it"
Barr "What steps are left for the Russian collusion part?"
Mueller "We're working our way up the responsibility tree with indictments and trying to flip"
Barr "The DOJ can do that. What else ?"
Mueller "... we're chasing down a number of leads from all the evidence we've gathered .. "
Barr "The DOJ can do that too"
Barr "Ok, Bob, let's wrap this up. Trump's all over me. Report on my desk in four weeks, ok?"
Trump to Giuliani "... start leaking to the press Mueller's wrapping up ..."
In addition to this notification, the Special Counsel regulations require that I provide you with a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General or acting Attorney General concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued. 28 C.F.R. 600.9(a)(3). There were no such instances during the Special Counsels investigation.
So there wasn't a specific proposed action.
Barr had already taken the position that Mueller's efforts on obstruction were misguided
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=11952157
so that part of the investigation was effectively dead when Barr got nominated. He is the Special Counsel's unrecused boss.
Maybe something like this happened:
Barr: "Have you got unreasonable doubt on Russian collusion yet?"
Mueller: "Not yet. We're working on it"
Barr "What steps are left for the Russian collusion part?"
Mueller "We're working our way up the responsibility tree with indictments and trying to flip"
Barr "The DOJ can do that. What else ?"
Mueller "... we're chasing down a number of leads from all the evidence we've gathered .. "
Barr "The DOJ can do that too"
Barr "Ok, Bob, let's wrap this up. Trump's all over me. Report on my desk in four weeks, ok?"
Trump to Giuliani "... start leaking to the press Mueller's wrapping up ..."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It is about what Mueller wrote, not about what he might say to disagree with Barr.
kentuck
Mar 2019
#10
Mueller was obstructed big time in the collusion investigation. Trump had a hand in that.
triron
Mar 2019
#23
That's a very bold statement to make. Hope Nadler's efforts show you are likely incorrect.
triron
Mar 2019
#24
Democrats need to see the report. I doubt Barr will withhold it unless he has totally lied.
Hoyt
Mar 2019
#3