Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jarqui

(10,126 posts)
17. That's hard because of the nature of the beast
Sun Mar 24, 2019, 09:33 PM
Mar 2019

If they knew all the answers, the investigation would be over.

Extending the budget on obstruction of justice was pointless in the AG's mind because
https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/19/politics/bill-barr-comey-obstruction/index.html

Mueller obviously didn't agree. But Barr was well within his rights after a couple of years to shut that portion down and get mutual agreement under the circumstances from Mueller because he'd kick the snot out of Mueller if he whined about it. It is the AG's call. They agreed to disagree and end it.

For Russia, they didn't know all the answers. So what concrete steps would Mueller be taking to determine if he could get proof beyond reasonable doubt after nearly two years plus FBI investigation time? Basically fishing and trying to shake down people they're prosecuting - getting them to flip - something vague like that. So Barr would hit him on specifics of what was left. "You've had two years , Bob. What is left for you to examine?" Mueller's vague. Barr cuts his budget. Game over.

When Barr was nominated, Mueller had to see the writing in the wall. Barr is partisan. Mueller not so much so. When Whittaker didn't pan out, Trump got his man to shut it down.

And every single one of your questions is ripe for investigation by: RHMerriman Mar 2019 #1
Yep, Barr gets in and, presto, the investigation is over... brush Mar 2019 #32
He couldn't have been FBaggins Mar 2019 #2
That isn't what Barr assured Jarqui Mar 2019 #5
Of course it is FBaggins Mar 2019 #7
Unless he ordered him to turn in the work he had already finished? kentuck Mar 2019 #8
That's just what the rule was created to catch FBaggins Mar 2019 #9
It is about what Mueller wrote, not about what he might say to disagree with Barr. kentuck Mar 2019 #10
What's to explain away? FBaggins Mar 2019 #12
That's not true DeminPennswoods Mar 2019 #15
Criminal prosecutions are not based on the preponderance of the evidence FBaggins Mar 2019 #18
Mueller was obstructed big time in the collusion investigation. Trump had a hand in that. triron Mar 2019 #23
How is obstruction not obstruction? FBaggins Mar 2019 #27
Barr most certainly can shut it down under the law Jarqui Mar 2019 #11
He absolutely CAN, but that's not the point FBaggins Mar 2019 #13
That's hard because of the nature of the beast Jarqui Mar 2019 #17
Sorry... that speculation is entirely unsupported FBaggins Mar 2019 #19
That's a very bold statement to make. Hope Nadler's efforts show you are likely incorrect. triron Mar 2019 #24
It isn't bold at all FBaggins Mar 2019 #28
There is not a lot of evidence otherwise. Jarqui Mar 2019 #25
Good synopsis. triron Mar 2019 #30
That is the basis of where I'm coming from Jarqui Mar 2019 #31
When was Barr appointed? Igel Mar 2019 #16
As a new AG, he'd have the right to step in and assess the budget and take Jarqui Mar 2019 #22
Democrats need to see the report. I doubt Barr will withhold it unless he has totally lied. Hoyt Mar 2019 #3
Very true customerserviceguy Mar 2019 #21
Bet he tries to. We will see. triron Mar 2019 #26
"Was Mueller pressured to end his investigation?" toddwv Mar 2019 #4
I believe there are all kinds of devious ways that would not be technically illegal. triron Mar 2019 #6
Um, sort of. Igel Mar 2019 #14
I trust Mueller. Cold War Spook Mar 2019 #20
Sure smells like it. democratisphere Mar 2019 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Was Mueller pressured to ...»Reply #17