Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Obama ENDORSES Bernie Sanders’ Constitutional Amendment to OVERTURN CITIZENS UNITED [View all]
During a Reddit IAmA chat, President Obama made some big news today by announcing that he supports a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United.
During his Reddit chat, Obama touched a topic that very few elected politicians will go near. The president not only discussed the role of money in politics, but he also endorsed a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United.
The president said,
Money has always been a factor in politics, but we are seeing something new in the no-holds barred flow of seven and eight figure checks, most undisclosed, into super-PACs; they fundamentally threaten to overwhelm the political process over the long run and drown out the voices of ordinary citizens. We need to start with passing the Disclose Act that is already written and been sponsored in Congress to at least force disclosure of who is giving to who. We should also pass legislation prohibiting the bundling of campaign contributions from lobbyists. Over the longer term, I think we need to seriously consider mobilizing a constitutional amendment process to overturn Citizens United (assuming the Supreme Court doesnt revisit it). Even if the amendment process falls short, it can shine a spotlight of the super-PAC phenomenon and help apply pressure for change.
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/z1c9z/i_am_barack_obama_president_of_the_united_states/c60nc6s
A certain Vermont Senator just so happens to have both a constitutional amendment, and a movement behind it to overturn Citizens United.
SECTION 1. The rights protected by the Constitution of the United States are the rights of natural persons and do not extend to for-profit corporations, limited liability companies, or other private entities established for business purposes or to promote business interests under the laws of any state, the United States, or any foreign state.
SECTION 2. Such corporate and other private entities established under law are subject to regulation by the people through the legislative process so long as such regulations are consistent with the powers of Congress and the States and do not limit the freedom of the press.
SECTION 3. Such corporate and other private entities shall be prohibited from making contributions or expenditures in any election of any candidate for public office or the vote upon any ballot measure submitted to the people.
SECTION 4. Congress and the States shall have the power to regulate and set limits on all election contributions and expenditures, including a candidates own spending, and to authorize the establishment of political committees to receive, spend, and publicly disclose the sources of those contributions and expenditures.
Hundreds of thousands of people have signed the petition in support of the constitutional amendment. People who have been paying attention to the effort to overturn Citizens United know exact what the president was referring to.
Obama was correct. The odds of successfully changing the constitution are small, but the amendment gives opponents a chance to discuss Citizens United each time it is brought up and talked about. The Disclose Act is just the first step. Citizens United must be overturned, and President Obama has provided a huge shot in the arm to Bernie Sanders and his movement to stop the conservative billionaires from buying our government.
http://www.politicususa.com/obama-endorses-bernie-sanders-constitutional-amendment-overturn-citizens-united.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
142 replies, 37033 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (283)
ReplyReply to this post
142 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama ENDORSES Bernie Sanders’ Constitutional Amendment to OVERTURN CITIZENS UNITED [View all]
Segami
Aug 2012
OP
So under Section 1, Limited Liability Companies have no constitutional rights.
Nye Bevan
Aug 2012
#7
So no constitutional protection against the police seizing the list of DU members and their details?
Nye Bevan
Aug 2012
#62
So you don't believe that LLC's such as DemocraticUnderground have any constitutional rights.
Nye Bevan
Aug 2012
#69
Rush Limbaugh stands shoulder-to-shoulder with you in your defense of the ACLU.
Ikonoklast
Aug 2012
#117
Excellent, and a great campaign issue when billionaires are so obviously taking over!
reformist2
Aug 2012
#28
This is huge!!!..Thank You President!!!...(although it does smell of two steps back/one forward)
lostnote12
Aug 2012
#42
Excellent!! Now for the hard part, getting the party to endorse it as a common goal! (except for
Dragonfli
Aug 2012
#45
Wow! Maybe I will vote for this guy. If only he could oppose the costly trade deals....
grahamhgreen
Aug 2012
#50
Well certainly what he said was a good step. But I don't see where he endorsed the Sanders proposal.
limpyhobbler
Aug 2012
#65
well they just copied and pasted it from politicususa.com so that site made the "error"
limpyhobbler
Aug 2012
#128
"Jim, I don't always agree with the ACLU, but I think they are correct on this issue". (nt)
Nye Bevan
Aug 2012
#120
A Constitutional amendment will take a long time. We need to make the supreme court overturn it now.
Fire Walk With Me
Aug 2012
#125
How do they know he endorsed the Sanders proposal instead of the one by Senator Udall?
limpyhobbler
Aug 2012
#132
I see zero reason to think that amendment would have changed the Citizens United decision
eallen
Aug 2012
#134
Corporations are already banned from contributing to candidate campaigns or political parties
Nye Bevan
Aug 2012
#139