Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Does Pelosi need a majority in the House to start Impeachment hearings? [View all]
never mind the vote to impeach - that comes at the end of the hearings process.
A lot of posters here keep writing that Pelosi needs to have the votes for impeachment, and that's why she's waiting.
But - how do impeachment hearings actually start?
thanks in advance
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
54 replies, 3517 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does Pelosi need a majority in the House to start Impeachment hearings? [View all]
ProfessorPlum
Jul 2019
OP
I would think that any committee chair could initiate the hearings but I think they would look to
Autumn
Jul 2019
#3
I don't believe that there aren't enough votes -Look at the list of Democrats that haven't announced
Pachamama
Jul 2019
#36
you don't bring something to the floor without the votes...and there is a very real chance
Demsrule86
Jul 2019
#27
No, they can start hearings that head towards impeachment and have damn near the same
uponit7771
Jul 2019
#5
Yep, its starting to look like this. Pelosi has an uphill climb because of not holding BushCo ...
uponit7771
Jul 2019
#17
No, they haven't "called off the 2020 elections" - and that will happen ONLY if enough Democrats
StarfishSaver
Jul 2019
#19
Correct, that's why I type "effectively" ... they don't have enough minerals to call off the ...
uponit7771
Jul 2019
#21
If you think "impeachment is about all we got" you're really saying they've called off the election
StarfishSaver
Jul 2019
#26
... effectively ... yes, I don't see how 2020 is going to be more free and fair than 2016 or 18
uponit7771
Jul 2019
#30
How would that be influencing people not to excecise their power to call their reps and demand
uponit7771
Jul 2019
#33
He will stonewall impeachment too...he doesn't care about prececdent or laws...and the moderates
Demsrule86
Jul 2019
#28
Moderates can do the right thing and keep their seats if there's justificaton for their actions.
uponit7771
Jul 2019
#29
Sorry that is completely unrealistic...if impeachment is unpopular and moderates do it anyway...
Demsrule86
Jul 2019
#52
Nixon impeachment 40% Trump impeachment 45%, ... the polls are either lying or they're not
uponit7771
Jul 2019
#53
+1, I wonder if it was like this during beginning of Nixon impeachment process
uponit7771
Jul 2019
#18
Cool, and impeachment became more popular after the process began it looks like. I pray Red Dons
uponit7771
Jul 2019
#22
Actually, impeachment became more popular BEFORE the impeachment inquiry was opened
StarfishSaver
Jul 2019
#23
Yes - those were the Senate Select Committee hearings in the spring and summer of '73
StarfishSaver
Jul 2019
#25
""For example, the impeachment process isn't started by 'drafting articles of impeachment.' We just
StarfishSaver
Jul 2019
#43
You don't seem to understand the distinction between the committee "considering Articles"
StarfishSaver
Jul 2019
#51