Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(101,322 posts)
5. Stopping the use of fossil fuels is more urgent. And then cutting down methane emissions.
Sun Jul 28, 2019, 04:17 AM
Jul 2019

The amount of land that lacks large-scale vegetation because of lack of water is relatively small; it's more been the uses we've put it to. And desalination plants require electricity, which we first need to use for replacing oil in transport, and gas in heating (and, of course, stop using fossil fuels to generate electricity). Solar panels and wind turbines also need electricity for their manufacture; since we need so many of them, that's another use of clean electricity to prioritise.

Cutting down methane emissions, from gas production and from cattle herds, is also a priority. Less cattle could mean more forests in some places. If any irrigation is done, it needs to be done in a global-warming-friendly way (you don't want swamps that produce methane; vegetation that locks carbon up in new soil or peat is good, however).

That is an excellent start. Kid Berwyn Jul 2019 #1
As far as the world population goes Everyman Jackal Jul 2019 #2
Thank you Boxerfan! Keep people AWARE DemocracyMouse Jul 2019 #3
Thank You! DarthDem Jul 2019 #4
Stopping the use of fossil fuels is more urgent. And then cutting down methane emissions. muriel_volestrangler Jul 2019 #5
Birth control Chuuku Davis Jul 2019 #6
Stop eating meat too... Joe941 Jul 2019 #7
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Follow me if you want to...»Reply #5