Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
11. Here's the let's-send-jobs-to-foreign-countries "free-trade" agreements that have been signed >
Thu Aug 30, 2012, 11:47 PM
Aug 2012
so far which have allowed Rmoney and others like him to send American jobs to foreign countries:

1994 - NAFTA

2001 - Jordan – United States Free Trade Agreement
2004 - Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement
2004 - Chile - United States Free Trade Agreement
2004 - Singapore – United States Free Trade Agreement
2005 - Dominican Republic–Central America Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA; incl. Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and the Dominican Republic)
2006 - Bahrain – United States Free Trade Agreement
2006 - Morocco - United States Free Trade Agreement
2006 - Oman – United States Free Trade Agreement
2007 - Peru – United States Trade Promotion Agreement

2011 - Panama - United States Trade Promotion Agreement
2011 - Colombia - United States Trade Promotion Agreement
2011 - Republic of Korea (South Korea) - United States Free Trade Agreement

Let's hope that we have enough Democratic Senators to return traditional capitalism to the U.S. and vote against the pending job-transferring "free-trade" agreement.

In the meantime, everyone should know that Rmoney supports the pending let's-send-even-more-jobs-to-foreign-countries "free-trade" agreement. Some are calling it the NAFTA of the Pacific.

Trans-Pacific negotiations have been taking place throughout the Obama presidency. The deal is strongly supported by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the top lobbying group for American corporations. Obama's Republican opponent in the 2012 presidential elections, Mitt Romney, has urged the U.S. to finalize the deal as soon as possible.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/13/obama-trade-document-leak_n_1592593.html

Not enough to save the middle class. immoderate Aug 2012 #1
^^^^This ^^^^ limpyhobbler Aug 2012 #5
Yep. I feel like this idea is spreading at the speed of light. reformist2 Aug 2012 #7
I was going to say the speed of jello. limpyhobbler Aug 2012 #9
You ran the numbers... immoderate Aug 2012 #15
Well this is some futuristic stuff I guess. limpyhobbler Aug 2012 #17
My eight hour a week estimate is based on some economist's estimate immoderate Aug 2012 #20
Cloud atlas corpocracy. Nt abelenkpe Aug 2012 #27
Yup. Eight hours/week/person to produce all we need to consume. immoderate Aug 2012 #8
Let me check your math.... limpyhobbler Aug 2012 #13
This is built on the assumption that such wealth being generated is spread fairly evenly. Selatius Aug 2012 #18
So lets dislodge them already. limpyhobbler Aug 2012 #21
When you challenge people with a lot of money, it usually gets bloody and messy quickly. Selatius Aug 2012 #24
Got to work with, or (if necessary) build Unions. n/t Amonester Aug 2012 #25
The French figured out how to do a good dislodging a coupla hundred years back... kath Aug 2012 #28
In theory, yes Incitatus Aug 2012 #10
hmmm.... Yes the owners are absorbing all extra value from productivity gains into their profits. limpyhobbler Aug 2012 #14
It is hard to conceptualize a life where work isn't the primary motivator to waking up. Selatius Aug 2012 #16
I've always wanted to learn the banjo. limpyhobbler Aug 2012 #19
On the contrary--I believe the government can afford to buy each of us a KIA SOUL! nt Romulox Aug 2012 #2
There's plenty of wealth - it needs to be shared. reformist2 Aug 2012 #3
Tariffs just make things unaffordable for the middle class TexasBushwhacker Aug 2012 #4
Here's the response I expected earlier...I disagree completely-its quality vs quantity in more Boxerfan Aug 2012 #30
It sounds crazy, but we need to start planning for an economy where not everyone needs to work. reformist2 Aug 2012 #6
It's called "automation socialism." immoderate Aug 2012 #12
Apparently not so well developed. reformist2 Aug 2012 #22
What's missing? immoderate Aug 2012 #23
Here's the let's-send-jobs-to-foreign-countries "free-trade" agreements that have been signed > AnotherMcIntosh Aug 2012 #11
It's very simple... WCGreen Aug 2012 #26
The 1%-ers have already decided the shape of the 'new economy' and have been putting the HiPointDem Aug 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I hate to tell you this n...»Reply #11