Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

BumRushDaShow

(128,911 posts)

1. They are already in civil court for some of the no-shows

Reply to Amaryllis (Original post)

Tue Sep 17, 2019, 08:45 PM

Sep 2019

The rules generally require referral to the DOJ which we know will do nothing and then they go to the courts - but when they do so, they have to have all their ducks in a row.

But as a note - why would they tell their strategy to some teevee pundit?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jackson Lee: We can't have this. CHris Hayes: You have it. What are you going to do about it? [View all] Amaryllis Sep 2019 OP

They are already in civil court for some of the no-shows BumRushDaShow Sep 2019 #1

You have valid point there. THat's what i was looking for; an alternative viewpoint. Not to be Amaryllis Sep 2019 #2

Here is an example BumRushDaShow Sep 2019 #4

THank you. Amaryllis Sep 2019 #5

You are welcome! BumRushDaShow Sep 2019 #6

they will continue doing what they should be held in contempt for until there are real consequences. Amyishere Sep 2019 #3

We are powerless. The only tool we have against tRump is... Hotler Sep 2019 #7