Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

marble falls

(60,219 posts)
Thu Sep 26, 2019, 09:07 PM Sep 2019

Why The Times Published Details of the Whistle-Blower's Identity [View all]

Why The Times Published Details of the Whistle-Blower’s Identity

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/reader-center/whistle-blower-identity.html

Our executive editor, Dean Baquet, addresses readers’ concerns about the decision to publish information on a person who is central to the Trump impeachment inquiry.

By The New York Times

Sept. 26, 2019
Updated 7:34 p.m. ET

On Thursday, The Times published exclusive details about the identity of the whistle-blower whose claims led Democrats to begin an impeachment inquiry against President Trump this week. (The article reported that the whistle-blower is a C.I.A. officer who was previously detailed to work at the White House and had expertise on Ukraine.)

Many readers, including some who work in national security and intelligence, have criticized The Times’s decision to publish the details, saying it potentially put the person’s life in danger and may have a chilling effect on would-be whistle-blowers.

<snip>

The president and some of his supporters have attacked the credibility of the whistle-blower, who has presented information that has touched off a landmark impeachment proceeding. The president himself has called the whistle-blower’s account a “political hack job.”

We decided to publish limited information about the whistle-blower — including the fact that he works for a nonpolitical agency and that his complaint is based on an intimate knowledge and understanding of the White House — because we wanted to provide information to readers that allows them to make their own judgments about whether or not he is credible.


We welcome your thoughts in the comments. We’ll be reading them.





It works for me. Part of whistle blowing almost in all instances requires signing your name to it in a forthright manner. This information needs to come out. It would seem to me that identifying the whistle blower at least to some degree would have a "moderating" effect on someone determined to cause the whistle blower to disappear or shut up.

Just saying.
Very very little more at the link.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Weak. Dean Baquet goes to great lengths to protect White House aides dalton99a Sep 2019 #1
He doesn't run into "our intellegence professionals" socially at 'the club'. marble falls Sep 2019 #3
Not buying it ArcticFox Sep 2019 #2
The explanation as to why they published the madaboutharry Sep 2019 #4
CBS news tonite dweller Sep 2019 #5
How many decades before Deep Throat's identity was verified... lame54 Sep 2019 #6
Exactly. dalton99a Sep 2019 #7
Deep Throat was whistleblowing to the WaPo. This one is reporting to the Fed ... marble falls Sep 2019 #13
The NYT's claims that... lame54 Sep 2019 #14
At some point he needs to named. Something about facing our accusers ... marble falls Sep 2019 #17
The presedence set is the opposite lame54 Sep 2019 #18
I will take the CREDIBILITY bestowed on the whistleblower by intelligence IG. TYVM. MFGsunny Sep 2019 #8
The NYT is more about celebrity journalism than credible or responsible journalism dalton99a Sep 2019 #9
Cherry picking maxsolomon Sep 2019 #21
Bullshit, Dean Baquet, you lying amoral goon. RockRaven Sep 2019 #10
+1000. nt ecstatic Sep 2019 #12
+10000 jeffreyi Sep 2019 #15
The IG confirmed the person was credible, they didn't need vetting by the NYT as well. meadowlander Sep 2019 #19
Readers Corgigal Sep 2019 #11
So much speculation about WB identity can endanger others librechik Sep 2019 #16
Sure, NY Times, the whistleblower's credibility is rusty fender Sep 2019 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why The Times Published D...