General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Why The Times Published Details of the Whistle-Blower's Identity [View all]
Why The Times Published Details of the Whistle-Blowers Identity
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/reader-center/whistle-blower-identity.html
Our executive editor, Dean Baquet, addresses readers concerns about the decision to publish information on a person who is central to the Trump impeachment inquiry.
By The New York Times
Sept. 26, 2019
Updated 7:34 p.m. ET
On Thursday, The Times published exclusive details about the identity of the whistle-blower whose claims led Democrats to begin an impeachment inquiry against President Trump this week. (The article reported that the whistle-blower is a C.I.A. officer who was previously detailed to work at the White House and had expertise on Ukraine.)
Many readers, including some who work in national security and intelligence, have criticized The Timess decision to publish the details, saying it potentially put the persons life in danger and may have a chilling effect on would-be whistle-blowers.
<snip>
The president and some of his supporters have attacked the credibility of the whistle-blower, who has presented information that has touched off a landmark impeachment proceeding. The president himself has called the whistle-blowers account a political hack job.
We decided to publish limited information about the whistle-blower including the fact that he works for a nonpolitical agency and that his complaint is based on an intimate knowledge and understanding of the White House because we wanted to provide information to readers that allows them to make their own judgments about whether or not he is credible.
We welcome your thoughts in the comments. Well be reading them.
It works for me. Part of whistle blowing almost in all instances requires signing your name to it in a forthright manner. This information needs to come out. It would seem to me that identifying the whistle blower at least to some degree would have a "moderating" effect on someone determined to cause the whistle blower to disappear or shut up.
Just saying.
Very very little more at the link.