Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)BREAKING: Trump Loses Court Fight to Keep Tax Records Secret From NY (!UPDATED!) [View all]
Last edited Mon Oct 7, 2019, 02:29 PM - Edit history (3)
UPDATED!!!!!A federal judge rejects Trump's "limitless assertion of presidential immunity from judicial process" and says the Manhattan D.A. can subpoena Trump's tax returns.
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/1878-07nytrump-ruling/3febb8a88a32dc2e6521/optimized/full.pdf#page=1
Link to tweet
COURT DECISION HERE:
http://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/editorialfiles/2019/10/07/Mazars.pdf
Breaking:
President Trump must turn over 8 years of his personal and corporate tax returns to Manhattan prosecutors, a federal judge ruled.
President Donald Trump may lose control of his tax filings after years of defying a modern presidential norm of disclosing them to the public, Bloomberg News reports.
A federal judge in New York ruled that Trump cant stop his accountants, Mazars USA LLP, from turning over his taxes and other financial documents to Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr., whose office is investigating whether the Trump Organization falsified business records related to hush-money payments.
Link to tweet
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-10-07/trump-tax-returns-loses-court-fight-to-keep-records-secret
Link to tweet
UPDATE:
Link to tweet
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BREAKING: Trump Loses Court Fight to Keep Tax Records Secret From NY (!UPDATED!) [View all]
kpete
Oct 2019
OP
Settled law can always be changed. Especially by this SCOTUS who doesn't believe in precedent...
Kablooie
Oct 2019
#44
Appeals to the Supreme Court aren't automatic, with a few narrow exceptions
The Velveteen Ocelot
Oct 2019
#97
Agreed, but this one I believe they will accept beccause it involves just what a sitting President
still_one
Oct 2019
#98
I'm in the same boat. Thanks for asking this. Also seems the judge would set a deadline for
triron
Oct 2019
#43
Oh my. You do know he is going to go full narcissist meltdown. We may be in a war by next week,
SummerSnow
Oct 2019
#10
"repugnant to the nation's governmental structure and constitutional values." - OUCH!
onetexan
Oct 2019
#63
They'll appeal the ruling. His lawyers will keep it locked up in the courts for a while. nt
Quackers
Oct 2019
#22
Yes they will appeal, but the judge refused to put a prelinary injunction in process, so I believe
vsrazdem
Oct 2019
#30
They will seek an immediate stay of the district court order before the subpoena is enforced
onenote
Oct 2019
#35
And they are putting themselves at risk by appealing, because the judge went into great detail
vsrazdem
Oct 2019
#61
Agree, but they are not asking Trump to release them. They are getting them from his accounting
vsrazdem
Oct 2019
#38
The GOP does realize that the tide will turn and Democrats will have the 3 branches of government?
usaf-vet
Oct 2019
#41
Agreed, but to slow the further destruction is the best we can hope for over the short term.
usaf-vet
Oct 2019
#58
If Roberts doesn't let his Republican claws show he will do the right thing and push the case back
onetexan
Oct 2019
#65
What's happened so far? The P is invincible according to tRump until somke other power
KPN
Oct 2019
#70
But wait there's more. This means by 4 PM EST, NY will have some of the financial info
ffr
Oct 2019
#69
Trump lawyers submitted an emergency halt to the order. damn. But as Trump always
riversedge
Oct 2019
#71
So why not refuse to grant a stay? Judge should know better. He has his head buried in the sand?
triron
Oct 2019
#89
"The knee-jerk attacks against the courts" are the result of people
The Velveteen Ocelot
Oct 2019
#93
Yes, but he granted a stay pending appeal! He *must* be a Trumpist stooge!
The Velveteen Ocelot
Oct 2019
#108
How am I not advocating rule of law?? A stay only 'may be granted'; not required to be.
triron
Oct 2019
#94
Because *all* parties have the right to appeal an unfavorable ruling.
The Velveteen Ocelot
Oct 2019
#92
The SCOTUS Justice for the 2nd District Appeals Court is Ruth Bader Ginsberg. 13 judges sit on
ancianita
Oct 2019
#77
Why is he fighting this considering this has been done by prior presidents? Obviously ...
SWBTATTReg
Oct 2019
#84