Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
Tue Oct 8, 2019, 04:27 PM Oct 2019

Update on the motion to stay in the Trump tax return case [View all]


As discussed previously, an NY prosecutor, Cyrus Vance Jr., is seeking to obtain Trump's tax returns from his accountants in relation to an investigation being conducted by the State of New York.

Trump has filed a federal case claiming a broad immunity to disclosure of the information sought by the State of New York.

The federal district judge shot that down in a scathing decision, in response to which Trump filed a motion for a stay pending expedited review by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals (the federal appeals court which hears cases from New York).

The 2nd Circuit, quite predictably, granted that motion. It is quite predictable because it would be unusual, regardless of how stupid the claim might seem, for an appellate court to leave a decision concerning a direct question involving the powers and immunities of a Constitutional office in the hands of a single district court judge.

Federal appeals cases, incidentally, are heard either by a panel of three judges, or by the full bench of that appeals court for a "we really mean it" decision which usually places the case in better condition to go to the Supreme Court.

In any event, as noted here, the grant was made by the judge indicated as "RJL" on the 2nd Circuit docket:

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/14664/trump-v-vance-jr/


MOTION ORDER, granting motion to expedite, [14] consideration for stay pending appeal and the merits of the appeal. Appellant's brief is due on 10/11/2019 at 5:00pm. The United States Department of Justice's amicus brief in support of Appellant is due at the same time. Appellees' briefs are due on 10/15/2019 at 5:00pm. Appellant's reply brief isdue on 10/17/2019 at 5:00pm. Argument will be scheduled as early as the week of 10/21/2019. The temporary administrative stay remains in effect until argument is completed, by RJL, FILED.


As is usually the case with these sorts of things, a number of persons here decided the judge was corrupt, not paying attention, on Trump's side, etc..

As is also usually the case with these sorts of things, I will continue to point out that the enemies of this country would like nothing better than for us to give up on our system of government, including the ability to change it, and the institutions which are designed to preserve it.

This is the judge whom those persons here at DU decided to attack and accuse of corruption, without even knowing who it was:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raymond_Lohier

He was the chief of the securities and commodities fraud task force in the criminal division of the U.S. Attorney's office. He was recommended by Sen. Charles Schumer for the nomination to the seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that was vacated by Sonia Sotomayor when she was elevated to the Supreme Court of the United States. Lohier is the first Haitian American to serve as an Article III Federal Judge and to be confirmed (unanimously) by the United States Senate as a Judge for the Second Circuit in New York. He was mentioned as a possible candidate for the Supreme Court by President Barack Obama.



26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thanks, again, for facts and insightful background. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2019 #1
good information. thanks. stopdiggin Oct 2019 #2
Thank you! The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2019 #3
At the level of the Supreme Court, though.... jberryhill Oct 2019 #5
True. It's unfortunate that the justices are selected more because of their biases The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2019 #7
That case was an abomination jberryhill Oct 2019 #10
Thank you for your time in researching and creating that informative and Atticus Oct 2019 #4
Thank you ismnotwasm Oct 2019 #6
Great post. All decisions are appealed and the process is what it is beachbumbob Oct 2019 #8
Thanks for the details Midnightwalk Oct 2019 #9
Great questions jberryhill Oct 2019 #11
Sure Rstrstx Oct 2019 #12
Thanks for your insights and commentary... Raster Oct 2019 #13
Thanks! Any idea how long this may drag out? Owl Oct 2019 #14
Depends on what you mean by "this" jberryhill Oct 2019 #21
October 21 is really quick StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #24
Thanks. Yes I was inquiring about when the appeal might be heard. Glad it's soon. Owl Oct 2019 #26
K & R bookmarking FakeNoose Oct 2019 #15
Thank you for the information. bitterross Oct 2019 #16
Appreciated this lucid explication and sagacious "warning" about some DU Prof.Higgins Oct 2019 #17
Thanks for this information. jalan48 Oct 2019 #18
Many thanks for the information...always helps to know what's going on! Karadeniz Oct 2019 #19
Stays pending appeal very common especially in a case like this. Pepsidog Oct 2019 #20
K&R...👍🏼 spanone Oct 2019 #22
Great information. Thanks! StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #23
Well done, as usual. n/t Ms. Toad Oct 2019 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Update on the motion to s...