Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Evergreen Emerald

(13,069 posts)
2. It has to be improper for him to bribe the jurors
Fri Nov 22, 2019, 05:55 PM
Nov 2019

How does he continue to get away with this? Didn't he call the senators and threaten to take away support if they voted for impeachment?

Now having lunch with them.

Susan Collins is very disappointed jberryhill Nov 2019 #1
And that counts for.... guillaumeb Nov 2019 #7
Lol ... every mention of Collin's hollow missives .. mr_lebowski Nov 2019 #43
It has to be improper for him to bribe the jurors Evergreen Emerald Nov 2019 #2
And this should be a reason for the House to open an investigation. eom guillaumeb Nov 2019 #8
That would be jury tampering in a real court. nt doc03 Nov 2019 #3
Asshole gets away with everything bluestarone Nov 2019 #4
There aren't charges yet, so I kinda doubt it ... mr_lebowski Nov 2019 #44
GTH Collins! MoonRiver Nov 2019 #5
Did he threaten to campaign for her? TheCowsCameHome Nov 2019 #6
They should be disqualified as jurors...nt 2naSalit Nov 2019 #9
Graham already stated that he will not even look at the evidence. guillaumeb Nov 2019 #10
Sure, but if that was the case, a lot of Democrats would have been disqualified from acquitting onenote Nov 2019 #12
Democrats knew that Clinton's behavior did not THREATEN the National Security ProudMNDemocrat Nov 2019 #23
And that was after he 2naSalit Nov 2019 #18
Agreed. guillaumeb Nov 2019 #21
Exactly... 2naSalit Nov 2019 #25
We have two things here. guillaumeb Nov 2019 #26
And never the twain shall meet (nt) mr_lebowski Nov 2019 #46
There is no process for disqualifying a Senator onenote Nov 2019 #30
A bit of history and law. onenote Nov 2019 #11
Understood. guillaumeb Nov 2019 #14
They said the same thing about Nixon. It changed. Lochloosa Nov 2019 #17
Which is one reason that the House should continue the investigation. eom guillaumeb Nov 2019 #20
They can start another at anytime. There's nothing in the Constitution stopping them. Lochloosa Nov 2019 #22
"I'm very concerned! ... Well ... actually ... not all that concerned ..." struggle4progress Nov 2019 #13
She is concerned..... guillaumeb Nov 2019 #15
Impeachment is a political act, not a legal act. Lochloosa Nov 2019 #16
Lindsay Graham already announced he would not look at any evidence. guillaumeb Nov 2019 #19
Country is over, done. Democracy done, over. rule of law gone. Eliot Rosewater Nov 2019 #28
There was a blue wave in 2018. guillaumeb Nov 2019 #31
Putin will decide if we even have power that day, let alone count votes. I wanna be wrong, I do. Eliot Rosewater Nov 2019 #32
If he could, he would have done it in 2018. eom guillaumeb Nov 2019 #33
He did, no way Rump won those 4 states Eliot Rosewater Nov 2019 #42
Trump wasn't on the ballot in 2018 ;) (nt) mr_lebowski Nov 2019 #48
oops , i meant 16...and i misread Eliot Rosewater Nov 2019 #49
bye felicia jpak Nov 2019 #24
the women who will die in illegal abortions alone should haunt her till her miserable life is over Eliot Rosewater Nov 2019 #27
That might be possible, if she had any conscience. eom guillaumeb Nov 2019 #29
Susan Collins Raftergirl Nov 2019 #34
Outrageous. Ethics be damned. Firestorm49 Nov 2019 #35
Openly trying. guillaumeb Nov 2019 #38
Somebody please refresh me Proud Liberal Dem Nov 2019 #36
If Susan Collins were to attend an execution by firing squad DFW Nov 2019 #37
Well said. eom guillaumeb Nov 2019 #39
More quid pro quo....back me or I'll pull the funding. nt UniteFightBack Nov 2019 #40
True. guillaumeb Nov 2019 #41
Well I can only hope that Trump promised JDC Nov 2019 #45
I hope her opponent got a picture Orangepeel Nov 2019 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Impeachment Juror Susan C...»Reply #2