Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Please don't get upset or worked up about the Supreme Court taking these cases [View all]
Accepting cert does NOT mean the Court is going to side with Trump. In fact, it could very well mean the opposite.
Take a breath, everyone.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
94 replies, 6301 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (57)
ReplyReply to this post
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Please don't get upset or worked up about the Supreme Court taking these cases [View all]
StarfishSaver
Dec 2019
OP
Didn't they already do that when they agreed to ask the Court to rule this term?
StarfishSaver
Dec 2019
#18
My question is why are they waiting until March to hear case and then June
underthematrix
Dec 2019
#4
7 of the 9 Supreme Court justices were appointed by Bushes, Obama or Clinton
StarfishSaver
Dec 2019
#79
Because there are three cases addressing basically the same issues -
The Velveteen Ocelot
Dec 2019
#8
I agree with you. There are three cases that raised important issues
The Velveteen Ocelot
Dec 2019
#20
But the issue is whether a president can assert absolute immunity from investigation
StarfishSaver
Dec 2019
#25
What it could mean is that a decision will be delayed until after the election.
Sneederbunk
Dec 2019
#19
It couldn't be accomplished by Congress even if Democrats did have the numbers
StarfishSaver
Dec 2019
#80
Exactly. Constitutional amendments aren't quite impossible, but almost;
The Velveteen Ocelot
Dec 2019
#83
The reason they would do it is the same reason the republicans have been doing everything
jcgoldie
Dec 2019
#52
This isn't about trying to be positive. I'm trying to help people understand what this means and doe
StarfishSaver
Dec 2019
#48
But it's yet another stonewall delay for trum. Court hears case in March 2020. Ruling in June.
iluvtennis
Dec 2019
#53
If they had let the lower court ruling stand, he'd just come up with another excuse
StarfishSaver
Dec 2019
#61