General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In general, the federal judges---and justices---that Trump and McConnell have elevated [View all]Atticus
(15,124 posts)In my post, "American values" was in quotes and was followed by several EXAMPLES of what that referred to. Which of those do you think would be okay to hear federal cases? The "out" racist"? The one who believes discrimination against gays is not just legal but "Biblically mandated"? Hm-m-m?
Further, " high crimes and misdemeanors" HAS been determined to mean whatever Congress says it means. A specific statutory "crime" is NOT required. Your position is identical to what the Republicans argued unpersuasively in an attempt to prevent Trump's impeachment. It is still bogus.
I suspect that you will find the above unsatisfactory as you seem more concerned with painting me as some sort of "morality police" than you are with civil discussion. I will give you the last word in this exchange as I do not believe we are currently contributing anything productive with this back-and-forth.