General Discussion

frylock

(34,825 posts)

50. there is never, ever a response to this when it's posted..

Reply to Luminous Animal (Reply #21)

Wed Sep 26, 2012, 07:46 PM

Sep 2012

all you'll get is la-la-la-la i can't hear you.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

125 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ralph Nader is a war criminal more aggresive than George Bush. [View all] Stuart G Sep 2012 OP

Ralph only cares for Ralph. /nt still_one Sep 2012 #1

What war crimes has he committed? ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #2

Agreed Sherman A1 Sep 2012 #63

I alert-ed this thread cprise Sep 2012 #104

What happened in 2000 is Bush stole the election...SCOTUS let him do it... joeybee12 Sep 2012 #3

The election would not have been in doubt for the SC to steal, save the 97k Nader votes in Florida. bluestate10 Sep 2012 #13

I didn't vote for Nader, so I'm not the one to say it... joeybee12 Sep 2012 #17

The election would have not been in doubt if 300,000 Democratic Floridians had not voted for Bush. Luminous Animal Sep 2012 #23

Yep, got a quote right from Ralph. FRN. nt bluestate10 Sep 2012 #68

bullshit. The election was never "in doubt!" gore won. Every way it was counted. And it was robinlynne Sep 2012 #55

That is the same Gore who won his home state? Sherman A1 Sep 2012 #65

No, that is the same President Gore. bluestate10 Sep 2012 #73

Well, we will never know, will we since 3 of the 21 instances of election irregularity the DOJ Samantha Sep 2012 #96

Gore won. bluestate10 Sep 2012 #69

Did you miss the supreme court? And the vote count done later by the U of chicago? robinlynne Sep 2012 #81

Assuming, of course, that some of those 97K wouldn't have voted for Bush dflprincess Sep 2012 #72

And, unfortunately, people have wasted the last 12 years dreaming of fucking Nader. Luminous Animal Sep 2012 #26

They need to get over Nader and focus on what you mention... joeybee12 Sep 2012 #31

Nader has been irrelevant for 12 years, but he makes a convenient excuse Lydia Leftcoast Sep 2012 #118

Utter nonsense. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2012 #4

You think what you think.. Stuart G Sep 2012 #8

300,000 Democratic Floridians voted for Bush. Perhaps you should save a bit of that vitriol for Luminous Animal Sep 2012 #21

there is never, ever a response to this when it's posted.. frylock Sep 2012 #50

Still not war crimes, not matter how you spin it ProgressiveProfessor Sep 2012 #35

Please explain how you think you can spin this into a war crime. n/t cherokeeprogressive Sep 2012 #45

no it did not make any difference. Gore won by a large margin anyway. robinlynne Sep 2012 #56

Really? Nader's words quoted and my arithmetic. bluestate10 Sep 2012 #24

Then Gore should have sought out the votes of the left that he didn't appeal to. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2012 #39

Gore picked Lieberman, the ABSOLUTELY WORST human being among the Dems... Bonobo Sep 2012 #71

All true zappaman Sep 2012 #123

The demand for the perfect. bluestate10 Sep 2012 #75

Who demanded perfection? Bonobo Sep 2012 #89

The frenzy of Derp has reached critical mass. Arctic Dave Sep 2012 #5

THIS Indydem Sep 2012 #7

I think it was a mistake for people to support Nader 2000 - that is hardly being a war criminal Douglas Carpenter Sep 2012 #6

Not the same as Debs..looks the same, sounds the same...not the same.. Stuart G Sep 2012 #14

no he is not the same as Debs and the historic conditions are not the same. but that does not make Douglas Carpenter Sep 2012 #18

Teh stoopid is strong here. Derp! GoneOffShore Sep 2012 #9

What's with all the attacks on Nader lately? ArcticFox Sep 2012 #10

This! MuseRider Sep 2012 #16

+1 n/t TDale313 Sep 2012 #33

Wow. That's some high-quality nonsense Scootaloo Sep 2012 #11

Nader is an anal retentive asshole. nt bluestate10 Sep 2012 #12

Which is why Karl Rove held the money strings on his 2004 presidential run. He's a phony and a sham. Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #15

Republican Contributions: $10.7 Million for Kerry vs. $111,700 for Nader Luminous Animal Sep 2012 #20

Bogus argument. When Republicans gave money to Kerry, they were trying to put Kerry, a DEMOCRAT, in Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #22

Really. Then why did many of them also donate to a REPUBLICAN in the same elections cycle? Luminous Animal Sep 2012 #27

We are talking about the Presidential race. Do you understand that Nader was actively, Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #28

answer the fucking question frylock Sep 2012 #52

Read my fucking answer to the fucking question. nt bluestate10 Sep 2012 #79

Excuse me? Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #87

did i stutter? frylock Sep 2012 #121

I explained it. Republicans contributing to Kerry wanted to put KERRY in the White House Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #122

Nope, I will never apologize for voting with my conscience. Bonobo Sep 2012 #74

Really? bluestate10 Sep 2012 #78

George Bush did not start wars because of how I voted. Bonobo Sep 2012 #84

Ralph Nader was working for the GOP in 2004. Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #88

No, I don't think that's true. Bonobo Sep 2012 #90

He knew what he was doing, and he had plenty of opportunity to change course. Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #93

Yeah, but that doesn't mean he was working for the GOP as you said, Warren. Bonobo Sep 2012 #98

In 2000, I could accept that he was just misguided. Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #101

Simple. McCain, when he still had full morals ran against Bush bluestate10 Sep 2012 #77

No, they were merely hedging their bets. They were working hard to get the Republican sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #106

Nader is an ass who sacrificed his moral authority to feed his ego. Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #108

It must be hard to have to deal with this much anger. I can't relate to it at all, especially sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #111

I'm angry at everyone responsible. I'm angry at the SCOTUS. I'm angry at the media. I'm even angry Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #115

Blah, blah, blah Blue_In_AK Sep 2012 #19

This may be the strangest, post I've read on DU... but I think I get what you're saying. MerryBlooms Sep 2012 #25

Nader did not cause Bush to become President obamanut2012 Sep 2012 #29

"Al Gore WON the 2000 election" : Absolutely true. northoftheborder Sep 2012 #91

Leave Ralph alone!!!... SidDithers Sep 2012 #30

good one! robinlynne Sep 2012 #57

Why? He can handle the few in this country who want to give a pass to the sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #114

Nader is a Jackass NOT a criminal jorno67 Sep 2012 #32

He's not a jackass either, Zippy. raw raina Sep 2012 #59

Welcome to DU! Robb Sep 2012 #60

Back atcha! raw raina Sep 2012 #62

oh...well, you convinced me. jorno67 Sep 2012 #67

Right. bluestate10 Sep 2012 #80

This message was self-deleted by its author AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2012 #82

Funny argument jorno67 Sep 2012 #117

I am not particularly a Nader fan, but this is bullshit. renie408 Sep 2012 #34

umm al gore lost the election by himself for running a crummy campaign. nice try tho nt msongs Sep 2012 #36

This is as bat-guano insane as anything by a right-winger DerekG Sep 2012 #37

Of "war crimes", nonetheless. wtmusic Sep 2012 #40

I think it's an oversimplification to call Nader a war criminal Downtown Hound Sep 2012 #43

If you want to go that route, we're all responsible DerekG Sep 2012 #94

Yeah, we're all responsible Downtown Hound Sep 2012 #103

You have no reason to think it was "so he could feel important". Bonobo Sep 2012 #99

You're right Downtown Hound Sep 2012 #109

I didn't say "no way" cause I don't play fast and loose with unknowns. Bonobo Sep 2012 #110

And the result of Ralph's "concern" that corporations own both parties? Downtown Hound Sep 2012 #116

^^^ THIS ^^^!!!! Tarheel_Dem Sep 2012 #38

lol... fascisthunter Sep 2012 #41

This is even stupider than the usual Nader bs. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2012 #42

Just can't get over the fact that the Democratic Party leadership torpedoed Gore's campaign Egalitarian Thug Sep 2012 #44

oh, what did Nader say today? ibegurpard Sep 2012 #46

You broke logic for good. Please come fix it. Bucky Sep 2012 #47

God, the Nader-Haters are insane. Marr Sep 2012 #48

argle bargle!!1 frylock Sep 2012 #49

A singularly deranged and irrational OP. Bonobo Sep 2012 #51

Post removed Post removed Sep 2012 #83

I like the posts that say how irrelevant he is or how nobody cares about him anymore, Snotcicles Sep 2012 #53

He has NO repsosnibility for anything that happened in 2000. You and I have more robinlynne Sep 2012 #54

oops black caucus and boxer stood up in 2004. correction. robinlynne Sep 2012 #58

Black caucus did stand up in 2000. NYC Liberal Sep 2012 #97

Yes. you're right.. In 2004 we got one senator to stand up. robinlynne Sep 2012 #119

War criminal? lordsummerisle Sep 2012 #61

lulz TransitJohn Sep 2012 #64

What a sorry fucker tabasco Sep 2012 #66

Wow. Congratulations. I never thought I would defend Ralph Nader. Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #70

I always enjoy seeing hyperbole used to redefine a term. hughee99 Sep 2012 #76

Same old tired shit. So old. morningfog Sep 2012 #85

He who ruined Green Party. nmbluesky Sep 2012 #86

The OP rudycantfail Sep 2012 #92

It's funny, but it's also terribly sad and terribly true. Bonobo Sep 2012 #95

It's hard to believe rudycantfail Sep 2012 #100

Have you ever thought of becoming a FoxNews news actor? If you truly believe what you wrote.... xocet Sep 2012 #102

The Supreme Court stole that election. Fire Walk With Me Sep 2012 #105

You don't like Democracy? You equate the democratic electoral process sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #107

Also something to wonder about: cprise Sep 2012 #112

Well I have wondered about this for a long time. The sheer hatred for someone who sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #113

The problem is bucking the establishment not "helping Bush win". TheKentuckian Sep 2012 #124

Have a nice life. GeorgeGist Sep 2012 #120

The OP expresses a sentiment soooo goofy, I'm left wondering if those that share it TheKentuckian Sep 2012 #125