Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

taxi

(1,896 posts)

12. My mistake. Should have stated that it was their coverage that allows fallacies to start

Reply to Claustrum (Reply #11)

Fri Mar 12, 2021, 12:13 PM

Mar 2021

Here is MSNBC saying if there is fraud - basically opening the door for yet to be made claims, and thus - here comes a defense against a non existing claim. Rope-a-dope.
We could probably do better in keeping our momentum and our strength, than playing their game.
I really wasn't meaning to blame you, although I did. I really don't like them.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why is it ok to have fraud for the PPP program but it's unacceptable for the current bill? [View all] Claustrum Mar 2021 OP

Bottom line is that there's Elessar Zappa Mar 2021 #1

I completely agree with you. Claustrum Mar 2021 #2

the difference is the gop engineered fraud into ppp.... getagrip_already Mar 2021 #3

Double standard Johnny2X2X Mar 2021 #4

I believe the PPP had a "better class" of fraudsters. JustABozoOnThisBus Mar 2021 #5

They are going to try to discredit the bill anyway they can. Even if they have to resort to Irish_Dem Mar 2021 #6

I remember Stephanie Ruhle asking about accountability when the PPP was passed. Raven123 Mar 2021 #7

Yes, I remember it well and that's why I was surprised she didn't challenge the republican Claustrum Mar 2021 #9

"Fraud" is a dog whistle. It means brown people stealing white mens money underpants Mar 2021 #8

Why must they always go with false equivalencies taxi Mar 2021 #10

I don't think they made a false equivalencies in this case. I was the one that brought in Claustrum Mar 2021 #11

My mistake. Should have stated that it was their coverage that allows fallacies to start taxi Mar 2021 #12