Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

sop

(10,177 posts)

2. "Apple and SIS have a qualified law enforcement privilege that allows them to err

Reply to Passenger (Original post)

Sun May 30, 2021, 08:58 AM

May 2021

in store security-related accusations and not be sued for it. However, if they exhibit 'reckless disregard for the truth,' ignoring obvious facts, for example, they lose that privilege."

I'd like to know how a corporation receives "qualified law enforcement privilege." It's bad enough police can do whatever they want, but now we have to worry about private security companies as well?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Apple sued in nightmare case involving teen wrongly accused of shoplifting ... [View all] Passenger May 2021 OP

What a mess Renew Deal May 2021 #1

Why file the same thing in three states? Mosby May 2021 #5

"Apple and SIS have a qualified law enforcement privilege that allows them to err sop May 2021 #2

Facial recognition tech needs to be put on trial, this should be considered a critical error ck4829 May 2021 #3

This wasn't done through facial recognition. LisaL May 2021 #4

Hold on... ck4829 May 2021 #7

This seems to be a way bigger issue than tech dsc May 2021 #6