Would 54-0 be enough to end a filibuster?

[Timewas]

7. Funny

They do not want to end it because they then give the rethugs the same advantage of no filibuster, that is their reasoning.But the rethugs use the "nuclear" constantly to get their way and the dems refuse to use it for some obscure reason. If they got rid of it and passed a slew of "good" bills that helped the people immensely do they not think that might,maybe just result in retaining power because of the good they did.. Of course the voting public doesn't really pay attention for longer than a few seconds then it is on to the next shiny distraction...Pols know this lack of attention span and use it constantly to lie during campaigns.