Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

skip fox

(19,357 posts)

6. Glad to hear this.

Reply to mucifer (Reply #5)

Mon Jul 5, 2021, 11:09 AM

Jul 2021

But there are those (Fox) who will repeat the original and ignore the retraction without a qualm.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Scientists quit journal board protesting 'grossly irresponsible' study claiming COVID-19 vaccines... [View all] NNadir Jul 2021 OP

I know you've been clear, but the magazine you have a problem with is Vaccines, not Science. skip fox Jul 2021 #1

Yes, of course. I've linked to a news item in Science, and not the original article, which... NNadir Jul 2021 #2

To make it clearer, I put in the reference to the Science News item. NNadir Jul 2021 #3

You were fine. It was very clear. skip fox Jul 2021 #4

At the end of the linked article it says the "vaccine" journal DECIDED TO RETRACT IT mucifer Jul 2021 #5

Glad to hear this. skip fox Jul 2021 #6

Not really. Anti-vaxxers still cite the retracted paper linking... NNadir Jul 2021 #7

Still it's important for people here to know it was retracted. It gives us ammo when people cite mucifer Jul 2021 #8

It has been retracted. Ms. Toad Jul 2021 #9

Scientists quit journal board, protesting 'grossly irresponsible' study claiming COVID-19 vaccines k Klaralven Jul 2021 #10

Though retracted, damage has been and will be done for a while. Pobeka Jul 2021 #11

Besides, as the vilest Writer has his Readers, so the greatest Liar has his Believers ... eppur_se_muova Jul 2021 #12

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Scientists quit journal b...»Reply #6