Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Hugh_Lebowski

(33,643 posts)
16. It's a lot grimmer and stark than Fallout (I've played 3, FONV and 4)
Thu Jul 15, 2021, 12:43 AM
Jul 2021

And it's a real shooter (ain't no V.A.T.S. lol), and the gun physics are pretty good actually. But it's a single player adventure/shooter/survival type of game. Mostly open world, up til the end when you go to Chernobyl itself, you can turn around and go back to where you started the whole thing. But there's NO fast travel.

It's a fairly wooly game (like, it's a little bit low budget and rushed) but like Fallout's, there some nice fan-made mods (and I mean there's A LOT of them).

The 'Complete' mods (there's one for S.O.C, Clear Sky, and Call of Pripyat ... each of the 3 games in the series) are definitely worthwhile, even for a first playthrough.

Where it REALLY succeeds is atmosphere, and the survival aspect. There's freaking scary places you go in this game, and a lot of fights that are no joke. ANd there's very little handholding, almost no tutorial, you just have to like ... figure the friggin world out. And SAVE A LOT, like, not just quick save. Make saves.

It's pretty beloved by a lot of gamers though despite it's rough edges. It has a charm and challenge to it that really no other FPS I've played has.

Oh, and it's also PC only, and Mouse/Keyboard only. And there's a lot of remapping of keys you'll want to do, some of the defaults suck . At this point though you don't need much PC power to play it.

If you decide to pick it up (it goes on sale on steam for cheap often), let me know.

DEFINITELY start with Shadow of Chernobyl though, not the other two.

Complete mod is here ... looks like there's an exe for it now ... nifty!

https://www.moddb.com/mods/stalker-complete-2009/downloads/stalker-complete-2009-14-exe-installer

Where I Work: Chernobyl. [View all] NNadir Jul 2021 OP
Almost all the admitted/confirmed human deaths from Chernobyl were the handful Hugh_Lebowski Jul 2021 #1
Sounds A Little Like 'Fallout" Jim G. Jul 2021 #4
It's a lot grimmer and stark than Fallout (I've played 3, FONV and 4) Hugh_Lebowski Jul 2021 #16
President Carter is among roughly 350,000 "liquidators" involved in nuclear reactor "clean ups." NNadir Jul 2021 #6
Thanks for your excellent response ... Hugh_Lebowski Jul 2021 #14
Message auto-removed Name removed Jul 2021 #2
I find it disturbing that humans going about their ordinary lives... hunter Jul 2021 #3
Chernobyl was a military reactor ... TomWilm Jul 2021 #5
This is not really true. The RBMK, which was very similar to design of the Hanford "N Reactor..." NNadir Jul 2021 #10
Not really sure what your point is ... TomWilm Jul 2021 #17
I'd turn it into a monument / art project. hunter Jul 2021 #18
It is about one kilometer long ... TomWilm Jul 2021 #20
Nevertheless, I Quixotic hunter still mock wind turbines. hunter Jul 2021 #21
You think the Soviets built 4000 MWe of power plants, Chernobyl 1-4, to power an antenna? NNadir Jul 2021 #22
Yes, that is what my Russian sources told me TomWilm Jul 2021 #23
You need better Russian sources. It's clearly nonsense. NNadir Jul 2021 #24
Fukushima Dai'ichi is the world's worst nuclear accident. roamer65 Jul 2021 #7
From this remark, I assume you know very little about the topic. n/t. NNadir Jul 2021 #8
Ok, so what should TEPCO do with the 1.37 million tons of radioactive water on the site? roamer65 Jul 2021 #9
Yes, they should dump it in the ocean. It's the smart thing to do. NNadir Jul 2021 #11
Never mind the radioactivity, eh? roamer65 Jul 2021 #13
Dumping it into a small area right off the coast of a populated island like Japan Hugh_Lebowski Jul 2021 #15
1.37m tons of water is 342,500,000 gallons. sir pball Jul 2021 #19
In 10-20 years its going to be even more obvious that fossil fuels were a very bad idea... hunter Jul 2021 #12
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Where I Work: Chernobyl.»Reply #16