Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(34,069 posts)
7. Because the ACA prohibits it.
Wed Aug 18, 2021, 11:38 PM
Aug 2021

Does no one remember one of the main premises of the ACA? Insurance companies which were free to set premiums as they deemed fit made anyone with a chronic health condition uninsurable. My daughter, with a condition that has a minimum of $200,000/year in billed expenses, was uninsurable, unable to stay in school full time after she reached the age 18 (a condition to remain on our insurance) and unable to work at a job that provided health insurance, was uninsurable. The ACA is the only way she has access to a means to pay for her health care.

Under the ACA, to avoid making people uninsurable, there are only 5 reasons to vary premiums: smoking, age, geography, single v family, and plan type.

Specific health conditions, or behavior (other than smoking) are not valid bases for charging one person higher premiums than another.

To change that, you would need to amend the ACA - which has been in litigation since it was enacted more than a decade ago. Anyone attempting to amend it to punish people based on health condition will earn my undying wrath.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why shouldn't health insu...»Reply #7