Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Atticus

(15,124 posts)

20. As I said, I did see what is now apparently a "blatant" violation of defendant's 5th and even

Reply to Sympthsical (Reply #17)

Wed Nov 10, 2021, 03:13 PM

Nov 2021

THIS judge referred to it in terms of "going right up to the line" or words to that effect. This occurred at the beginning of the prosecutor's cross of the defendant.

Was there another instance that I missed?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Rittenhouse defense attempts to light the fuse [View all] Sympthsical Nov 2021 OP

For what? Some of us are at work and can't hear or watch. Maru Kitteh Nov 2021 #1

The prosecution managed two massive violations Sympthsical Nov 2021 #2

Ultimately Effete Snob Nov 2021 #4

I don't see how it isn't an acquittal Sympthsical Nov 2021 #5

That has nothing to to do with this motion Effete Snob Nov 2021 #11

I meant that the trial itself goes to the jury Sympthsical Nov 2021 #14

I have not seen much of this trial because I turned it off in utter disgust---with the judge! Atticus Nov 2021 #16

I've been watching it live Sympthsical Nov 2021 #17

As I said, I did see what is now apparently a "blatant" violation of defendant's 5th and even Atticus Nov 2021 #20

This message was self-deleted by its author Atticus Nov 2021 #21

It's on the judge. He started out saying bs against the media for calling him out rockfordfile Nov 2021 #29

I have yet to see any legal commenter disagreeing with the 5th Amendment thing Sympthsical Nov 2021 #31

For anything Effete Snob Nov 2021 #3

Question for those who have actually been watching the trial.....Do you think walkingman Nov 2021 #6

Does a bear shit in the forest? Scottie Mom Nov 2021 #8

I think he meets the legal standard of self-defense Sympthsical Nov 2021 #9

Is that his defense? leftstreet Nov 2021 #18

the prosecutor's Chille Nov 2021 #23

I think this was way over-charged Sympthsical Nov 2021 #25

Thanks leftstreet Nov 2021 #26

He is still testifying. Kingofalldems Nov 2021 #28

Let's call it a preponderance of available evidence Sympthsical Nov 2021 #30

Victims. those people he shot were victims. rockfordfile Nov 2021 #32

I can't recall Busterscruggs Nov 2021 #7

He'll get away with it. No one questions that he was the one who shot Hav Nov 2021 #22

He still wouldn't know Busterscruggs Nov 2021 #33

Good to hear from the Biggest Fan greenjar_01 Nov 2021 #10

I apologize for trying to be objective about the trial Sympthsical Nov 2021 #12

ROFL greenjar_01 Nov 2021 #13

Whatever happened to ROFLcopter? Sympthsical Nov 2021 #15

Funnily enough... Jedi Guy Nov 2021 #19

It's certainly been useful for school Sympthsical Nov 2021 #27

the news media Chille Nov 2021 #24