Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Rittenhouse Judge screwed up! [View all]FBaggins
(26,760 posts)26. In the past AND currently
YOUR response is not a of law
You have it exactly backwards. It is you that has imagined a brand new standard without citing any legal authority. When did it change? What case can you cite?
Note that you imagined some odd interpretation of the Jurors Bill of Rights - yet the actual BOR dates to the same time when our judiciary was created. Youve admitted that that judges used to cite the Bible all the time and claim that something has changed you youve provided zero evidence (legal or rhetorical) to support this.
Its clear that you would like a different standard - but the rest of us have to live in reality. You might consider joining us. There is no prohibition on publicly mentioning the Bible.
If I was a juror, I wouldn't be happy
Is that a reason for anyone else to care? Have we added a make Smackdown2019 happy amendment that I missed?
What if there were JEWS in the jury box?
Jewish law had the same hearsay standard as the one Paul relied on in the verse mentioned. And, of course, Paul was Jewish.
You have it exactly backwards. It is you that has imagined a brand new standard without citing any legal authority. When did it change? What case can you cite?
Note that you imagined some odd interpretation of the Jurors Bill of Rights - yet the actual BOR dates to the same time when our judiciary was created. Youve admitted that that judges used to cite the Bible all the time and claim that something has changed you youve provided zero evidence (legal or rhetorical) to support this.
Its clear that you would like a different standard - but the rest of us have to live in reality. You might consider joining us. There is no prohibition on publicly mentioning the Bible.
If I was a juror, I wouldn't be happy
Is that a reason for anyone else to care? Have we added a make Smackdown2019 happy amendment that I missed?
What if there were JEWS in the jury box?
Jewish law had the same hearsay standard as the one Paul relied on in the verse mentioned. And, of course, Paul was Jewish.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Want to do some about the Judge in the Rittenhouse trial, file a complaint.
LetMyPeopleVote
Nov 2021
#1
I have watched some of it and the judge seems out of control. Not calm and reasonable.
olegramps
Nov 2021
#70
He's going for a mistrial so that piece of shit can WALK free and live his best, murderous life.
LenaBaby61
Nov 2021
#2
I haven't even bothered to watch the trial, but from what I've read/heard ...
LenaBaby61
Nov 2021
#30
Exactly!! Wouldn't mind seeing the judge being put on trial after Rittenhouse is convicted.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Nov 2021
#8
Per testimony.....The "cool" firearm Kyle owned never left the state of WI
Heartstrings
Nov 2021
#71
Exactly. I want the little prick jailed for murder, and I want him to do max time, but ...
11 Bravo
Nov 2021
#29