General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Retired NSA Analyst Proves GOP Is Stealing Elections [View all]rightsideout
(978 posts)Romney's line starts out lower than Santorum's but then his line rises as the precincts get larger. Precinct size is based on population not registered voters. I agree that it would appear that larger precincts will have more voters.
But Santorum's line dives down as Romney's line rises up. It seems likes votes for Santorum are flipping to Romney. The lines are flipped mirror images of each other. The other candidate's lines aren't doing this. It's suspect when you have linear relationships that mirror each other. You would think there would be some variable lows and highs but not a mirror image of two lines. That's friggen weird.
But what's interesting is. This line behavior doesn't happen when there is no Central Tabulature and the votes are hand counted. The precinct size in that case doesn't appear to make any difference and the lines are pretty much the same.
I think it's strange and at least deserves some further analysis. At least more oversight should be done where votes are put into the Central Tabulature since that is where this appears to be occuring.
I couldn't understand what the guy who found this was saying until I saw the graphs.
If you read the PDF article and the links it is eye opening.
Looks like a good case for the NUMB3RS TV show.