Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Retired NSA Analyst Proves GOP Is Stealing Elections [View all]randome
(34,845 posts)276. With the added advantage that you don't need to consider opinions that differ from your own.
Putting anyone on Ignore, IMO, is a cop-out. It shows you're not willing to enter into a debate.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
298 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I own a computer services company -- it is very easy to create programs that disappear, reappear
AikidoSoul
Oct 2012
#229
"trade laws prohibit that you investigate the firmware, hardware or software"
FiveGoodMen
Oct 2012
#239
That's what continually concerns me since 2000 (and even before that really)
ProfessionalLeftist
Oct 2012
#7
If you don't get why it's so easy to steal elections when computers are used,
AikidoSoul
Oct 2012
#231
It doesn't matter whether or not you 'buy into' the fact that those machines
sabrina 1
Nov 2012
#295
SPOT ON! Let's ask ourselves why, why, why??????????????? They've known about the theft potential
AikidoSoul
Oct 2012
#233
We need to organize over this. But the fact the neither the Dems nor the Rs has made a fuss makes me
Dark n Stormy Knight
Oct 2012
#257
not according to the NASA IT guys. who , underoath it is the easiest thing in the owrld to make
robinlynne
Oct 2012
#143
not at all. google Clint Curtis and congress. He was a NASA programmer hired to write this
robinlynne
Oct 2012
#155
You are aware that it's illegal to look at the "proprietary" code of these machines?
Doremus
Oct 2012
#158
I will fiond the link for you. you are incorrect. Florida was rpogrammed to flip the vote in all of
robinlynne
Oct 2012
#209
You think wrong. sorry. This I can tell you from personal election monitoring experience.
robinlynne
Oct 2012
#216
He testified that he was hired to and wrote the software to flip half of Florida. watch again.
robinlynne
Oct 2012
#266
Your point? It is proven beyond any doubt. done. proven. argument over. watch Dan
robinlynne
Oct 2012
#271
oh, and what happened back then was Terry Schiavo. On the exact same day this Congressional hearing
robinlynne
Oct 2012
#217
not true. half of florida in 2000 is not small. How was it dealt with? noone even went to jail?
robinlynne
Oct 2012
#205
Yes. the GOP head IT man died in an airplane creash rihgt before he was suppo to testify about the
robinlynne
Oct 2012
#202
Sorry to join the mob, but you're just wrong. The errors of your reasoning have been presented
Dark n Stormy Knight
Oct 2012
#260
"Worst case I've seen is the crap that single clerk in Wisconsin pulled." Then you are uninformed.
Doremus
Oct 2012
#160
Ever vote on punch cards? Ever vote on optiscan? Ever vote on lever machines?
RomneyLies
Oct 2012
#101
watch this video. you wanted evidence. And 3rd parties have been counting votes
robinlynne
Oct 2012
#211
bcause they drank the kool aid Bush/Rove sold the country....fast is good. private is necessary.
robinlynne
Oct 2012
#206
I'm sure you know far more than the statisticians whose job it is to analyze this data.
EOTE
Oct 2012
#24
Anyone who is fine with proprietary voting software that can't be audited in the least...
EOTE
Oct 2012
#186
Since the BBV scammers fdon't have any arguments, I don't need anything to counter them. nt
RomneyLies
Oct 2012
#127
Well, the geniuses that brought us Palin and Romney can't be that good at their jobs.
randome
Oct 2012
#95
There is no trail. You imagine a bunch of wrong things. You need to read up.
robinlynne
Oct 2012
#268
of course they did. they just did not steal enough votes. Obama's win was huge. not 3 points.
robinlynne
Oct 2012
#38
They didn't expect Obama to win by the margin he did, so their cheating was insufficient to cover...
Scuba
Oct 2012
#18
If the votes were honestly counted the last time it would have shown that Obama won by a landslide
madokie
Oct 2012
#52
And not a single case of voting fraud on a wide spread scale due to voting machines.
RomneyLies
Oct 2012
#72
Good. If we need you we'll go look for you in the whacked out posters threads.
cui bono
Oct 2012
#176
Ahh, so you're continuing your long standing tradition of responding to posts which you haven't read
EOTE
Oct 2012
#248
Take a little more time to read the thread. No one is saying they haven't been trying.
randome
Oct 2012
#149
You are arguing apples and oranges. Either an election is verifiable, or it is NOT. Either each cit
robinlynne
Oct 2012
#156
And yet, depending on the poll, Romney's neck and neck with Obama. Pretty good for a party
Doremus
Oct 2012
#167
I dunno. It might have made a difference if we had 62 or more Democratic senators, not just 59.
Selatius
Oct 2012
#130
Accepting criticism of privately owned and proprietary voting machines as "conspiracy theories" is
EOTE
Oct 2012
#187
Every allegation that two or more people have planned to do something wrong is a conspiracy theory
FiveGoodMen
Oct 2012
#65
You'd have to be god to make the statement 'not a single case of "black box voting" has happened'
FiveGoodMen
Oct 2012
#96
And I don't have to beleive half baked conspiracy theory nonsense just because you do.
RomneyLies
Oct 2012
#112
Have a nice day then. I can see we're not really making any progress holding a civil discussion. nt
Selatius
Oct 2012
#139
"Not a single case of election fraud through computerized machines has ever occurred."
FiveGoodMen
Oct 2012
#98
oh really? That is the GOP argument, and the same argument used by the private, right wing corporate
robinlynne
Oct 2012
#269
Vote or voter fraud is different from election fraud and they are not interchangable terms.
tandem5
Oct 2012
#83
Right, so in order for this theory of yours to work. Obama must be complicit in the conspiracy.
tritsofme
Oct 2012
#240
To me, the most compelling evidence that these machines are rigged is the fact that exit polling,
Nay
Oct 2012
#80
They are one consortium. There is ONE group. not many. not two even. It is a group
robinlynne
Oct 2012
#267
I hate to break this to people, but there are a lot of idiots and dumbasses in this country.
NYC Liberal
Oct 2012
#165
"Voters in Britain know the count is accurate because every ballot is transparently hand-counted. "
marions ghost
Oct 2012
#246
I'm damn glad the Dems went to war for clean voting when we gave them the majority
upi402
Oct 2012
#253