Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

ultralite001

(894 posts)
Fri Jun 24, 2022, 02:20 PM Jun 2022

Four ways to expand the US Supreme Court... [View all]

Excerpted from the Harvard Law & Policy Review:

The first and most straightforward approach to expanding the Court is adding two, four, or six new justices to the Court. This suggestion has been advanced by Professor Michael Klarman of Harvard Law School, among others...

The second option is to reconstitute the Supreme Court in the image of a federal court of appeals. This course of action would increase the number of justices to fifteen or a similar number. Panels of justices would be drawn from this larger group, with an option of en banc review. This plan would not only dislodge the Court’s current reactionary majority, but the panel format also would allow a greater number of cases to be heard.

Third is the Supreme Court Lottery, a more aggressive version of the panel strategy. Daniel Epps and Ganesh Sitaraman outlined this proposal in a Yale Law Journal piece. All federal appellate court judges, roughly 180 in total, would become associate justices on the Supreme Court. Panels of nine justices would be randomly selected from this pool. Importantly, decisions on whether to grant certiorari on a given case would be made by panel members who would not know the ideological makeup of the panel that would hear the case. This plan would frustrate partisan maneuvering.

Fourth and finally is Epps and Sitaraman’s idea for a “Balanced Bench.” The Court would have ten justices, with five seats allocated to each of the two major parties. Those ten justices would select sets of five additional justices at a time to serve a future, non-renewable one-year term. That selection would operate on a requirement of near-unanimity to ensure that this final set of five justices would be relatively even-handed. This proposal aims to counteract the effects of partisanship on the Court by explicitly recognizing and institutionalizing partisanship presence.


[link:https://harvardlpr.com/2019/05/06/the-supreme-court-has-been-expanded-many-times-before-here-are-four-ways-to-do-it-today/|]

From the Yale Law Journal:

How to Save the Supreme Court
[link:https://bit.ly/3NfeveR|]

Supreme Court as Superweapon
[link:https://www.yalelawjournal.org/forum/supreme-court-as-superweapon|]
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
K&R, ... and each one of the is going to be done if GZP gets control of Congress and WH uponit7771 Jun 2022 #1
What odds do any of these ideas have? BSdetect Jun 2022 #2
Majority of House and Senate, signed by the president. NYC Liberal Jun 2022 #4
And the Filibuster? nt leftieNanner Jun 2022 #5
Obviously there's that. I was just answering the question of the process. NYC Liberal Jun 2022 #9
Ah. I understand your point. leftieNanner Jun 2022 #10
Therein lies the rub... ultralite001 Jun 2022 #12
Add 6 liberals. Meadowoak Jun 2022 #3
Easy to say, hard to do, with only 48 reliable senate votes. nt JustABozoOnThisBus Jun 2022 #7
Maybe after November, we will have more. Meadowoak Jun 2022 #15
From your keyboard to Dog's motherboard. nt JustABozoOnThisBus Jun 2022 #17
This is the sort ForgedCrank Jun 2022 #6
The more Judges on the Supreme Court, the better. Midnight Writer Jun 2022 #8
+1 Meadowoak Jun 2022 #16
Actually 5 The Grand Illuminist Jun 2022 #11
Seems a long way to go... ultralite001 Jun 2022 #13
Maybe not after this. The Grand Illuminist Jun 2022 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Four ways to expand the U...