General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Justice for JFK [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)You claimed everything in that report was accurate and should be taken at face value. That is a summary of your contentions.
I provided you with one reason why people question the report. The fact that the main interrogator did not take any notes during 12 hours of questioning Oswald.
You disputed that claim and asked where I 'got it'. I told you it was in the WCR and provided you with the WCR's own statement. Facts.
You, ironically, who claimed I should not question the WCR, set about trying to prove that the WCR was lying by providing a link to some scribbled notes taken by someone else.
I know you thought you were trying to expose ME as the liar. But in your haste to do that you were actually, especially since I provided you with the WCR's own words, questioning THEIR claims.
So what was your logic in trying to back up every word in that report, then when I provided you with information FROM the report, YOU, NOT I, questioned the WCR with a link hoping to prove them/me wrong!
Your link proved both the WCR and ME to be correct. So in trying to figure out your logic, I have to conclude that you too have questions about the report.
It does stretch credulity to think that the chief investigator in one of the most historical investigations in this country, actually took no notes. So I can't really blame you for doubting them I suppose. However it appears you were wrong and that the WCR was correct. There are no notes from the chief investigator, incredible as that is. I'm glad we agree on that at least. And that you too have questioned it.